The Guardian today leads with the story that a US National Intelligence Estimate, which pulls together the work of the 16 American intelligence agencies, concluded: “We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003 Tehran halted its nuclear weapons programme.” Whoops. What are the neo-conservatives going to do now? The article goes on to say:
In a startling admission from an administration that regularly portrays Iran as the biggest threat to the Middle East and the world, the NIE said: “We do not know whether [Iran] currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.” That contradicts the assessment two years ago that baldly stated that Tehran was “determined to develop nuclear weapons”.
…
Although a halt to the nuclear weapons programme is significant, the NIE is far from a clean bill of health for Iran. Tehran is pushing ahead with its uranium enrichment programme, which has only limited civilian use and could be quickly converted to nuclear military use. The NIE warned that Iran could secure a nuclear weapon by 2010. The US state department’s intelligence and research office, one of the agencies involved, said the more likely timescale would be 2013. All the agencies concede that Iran may not have enough enriched uranium until after 2015.
Which, in my view, indicates that while diplomatic pressure must remain on the country to avoid building nukes, there is no viable reason to go to war with the country to protect Israeli sovereignty anytime soon. In case that wasn’t already obvious.
The decision to publish the NIE is aimed at trying to recover the public credibility lost when the agencies wrongly claimed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction in the years leading up to 2003.
No shit sherlock.
Tweet |
All seems quite reasonable.
The report suggests that Iran is not as desperate to get nukes as some people pretend, and suggests likewise that America is not as desperate to invade iran as some people pretend.
No doubt the hint of military action will remain, since it would be hard to argue that Iran’s move away from developing nuclear weapons didn’t coincide somewhat with an increased threat of intervention.
But if we all get what we want without bloodshed thats a good thing.
Exploding heads in Tel Aviv.
“there is no viable reason to go to war with the country to protect Israeli sovereignty anytime soon. ”
Iran hasn’t been threatening Israel’s sovereignty (how could it?), it has been threatening its existence
The 2007 NIE does not eliminate Iran as a threat to mid-east peace. It eliminates them as a nuclear threat to mid-east peace and removes any case for military strikes against suspected nuclear facilities. The 2005 IC assessment was vague enough to allow folks to feel nervous about Iran’s intent and capability.
Iran is still a threat to peace in the region, mostly in Lebanon and between Israel and Palestinians.
However, this estimate brings a big sigh of relief to a lot of people, as I am sure you will agree.
Nicely put together blog, by the way!
JG
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
11 Comments 4 Comments 36 Comments 15 Comments 4 Comments 15 Comments 47 Comments 39 Comments 34 Comments 19 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Matt Munro posted on Why climate talks in Cancun failed miserably » UK Occupations Holding it Down Over Break « occupy california posted on 49 universities are or were under occupation » the a&e charge nurse posted on John Pilger shames himself by attacking feminists over Julian Assange » Jeremy Poynton posted on 49 universities are or were under occupation » Matt Munro posted on Why climate talks in Cancun failed miserably » Hannah B posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » Topsy Kretts posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » Soph posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » Lawrence Mills posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » Kate posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » Briar posted on John Pilger shames himself by attacking feminists over Julian Assange » Ben Cooper posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » ukliberty posted on John Pilger shames himself by attacking feminists over Julian Assange » Macdog73 posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed » Ronaldinhio posted on Press Complaints Commission says general homophobia is allowed |