Tomorrow, voters in South Carolina vote for their preferred Democrat candidate. I’ve always supported Obama just so you know my preference. SC is important because the person who wins carries that momentum and glow to Super Tuesday on 5th February, when voters in over 20 American states get to choose their candidate.
Barack Obama is almost certainly likely to win SC because half of registered Democrat voters there are African-American, and in Nevada they favoured him 80-20. Clinton has the Hispanic, ‘downscale Democrat’ and (elder) female vote. Obama has the young, richer Democrats and African-American vote.
I’m hoping that Obama wins by over 15% and Clinton comes third, to put a serious dent in her campaign. Interestingly, yesterday John Kerry came out attacking the Clintons for trying to “swiftboat” Obama. Kerry is still highly regarded among many Democrats and it looks like Clinton is doing a good job of alienating the Democrat establishment. This strategy – using others to attacking Clinton rather than do it himself – should have been conceived ages ago since Hillary is doing it brilliantly by using Bill.
It also looks to be back-firing.
A growing number of Democrats have been speaking out against Bill Clinton’s recent remarks, which Obama supporter Sen. Dick Durbin likened to swiftboating, while more reporters are scrutinizing the former President’s claims. On Tuesday, ABC News’ Jake Tapper reported that Bill Clinton has been “spreading demonstrably false information,” while Chicago Tribune columnist Eric Zorn provided a rare conclusion for the political press: “Bill and Hillary Clinton have lied brazenly about Obama’s recent statement about Ronald Reagan.”
But I agree with Michael Tomasky that Obama needs to attack Clinton’s dismal record too. I’ll be live-blogging the SC results using some fancy new tools so stick around tomorrow evening/night.
On the Republican side, Rudy “9/11″ Giuliani should be out of the picture once he comes third in Florda – the next Republican contest. I’m hoping Mitt Romney wins just so he can puncture McCain’s campaign. Republicans in the state should also be split between older and Jewish voters choosing McCain (being helped by Joe Leiberman) and lots of evangelicals supporting Huckabee. Both are running out of money and hopefully a split vote will further de-rail their campaigns.
Yesterday I managed to attend a talk by Simon Rosenberg of New Democracy Network, which I trailed here. Rosenberg was wildly optimist about the Democrats this election and going forward, and for good reason. Not only are the two main Democrat candidates raising way more money than all of the Republican candidates combined, but turnout, support and organisation on the left is much more superior this election cycle.
Going forward, he said that demographics and changing social attitudes (that young people, the Millenials as he calls them) are much more socially liberal than their parents. Plus, minorities like Hispanics and African-Americans are overwhelmingly Democrat, and their share of the electorate is growing.
One could argue, fairly rightly, that demographics aside the Democrats haven’t really convinced the electorate that they have a convincing agenda for attracting their votes. People just hate the Republicans and the only alternative is the Democrats. That is still a dangerous situtation to be in for the Democrats, especially since an increasing number of people see themselves as ‘independent’.
post to del.icio.us |
I’ve got a theory, though it could be completely wrong. According to the polls (only 1% undecided unlike New Hampshire) Obama has been holding steady in this state for weeks now, but because of this spat Edwards is climbing back up the rankings (not suggesting that was tactical).
The polls state that between 40-50% of the turn out is likely to be black, and assuming a similar mindset as Nevada that almost guarantees him 30-40% of the vote. Those under 50 are backing him more than Clinton, and he is trumping on pretty much every subject there is at the minute. people are more set on voting for Obama than others are set on voting for Clinton. As has been the case throughout his campaign, Obama has staunch and loyal support that is unwavering, while being unable to really gain any more. In South Carolina this shouldn’t matter because his type of support is potentially much greater than anyone elses.
If he therefore comes out of this state, given that Edwards will be splitting the Clinton vote more now than he would have a week ago, with a double digit victory…perhaps then, when Clinton is at her lowest since Iowa, Obama will make political headway before Super Tuesday by attacking her Record when it matters, and when Clinton can only come off as defensive or repetative/petty.
Or he could just not be as smart as a presidential candidate should be on these matters, we’ll know in 48 hours!
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
33 Comments 96 Comments 13 Comments 14 Comments 62 Comments 21 Comments 22 Comments 11 Comments 23 Comments 8 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » damon posted on Tories try to rehabilitate disgraced advisor » Alexander posted on Three years on, Israel's blockade is still illegal » Shuggy posted on Am I the world's freest woman? » Shatterface posted on Am I the world's freest woman? » Counterview posted on Tories try to rehabilitate disgraced advisor » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » sally posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » sally posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » blanco posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » captain swing posted on Oona King unveils strong support against Ken » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » LMO posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » J posted on Am I the world's freest woman? |