Welcome to Casting the net, Liberal Conspiracy’s daily web review. As always, please feel free to share your own recommendations in the comments.
The Goldern Strawberry – Scandal in Helsinki? Surely not! (You’d think those Northern Europeans would be a bit less judgmental).
Shiraz Socialist – Methinks this polemic from Andrew Coates will prove quite controversial. An intricate dissection of the left and religion.
Question That – With May 1st around the corner, Ian’s running out of time and needs to make a decision: Ken or Boris?? C’mon man!
The Yorksher Gob – With a second choice vote up yer sleeve, there really isn’t any excuse for not voting for who the hell you like, however unlikely it is they’ll get the keys to City Hall.
John Harris – Are we swearing just a bit too much?
Earthpal – Those teachers are on strike. AGAIN. This mum’s just a bit pissed.
Tim Worstall – Ah, some refreshing sanity on the aviation pollution debate.
post to del.icio.us |
Are we swearing too much? Fuck, no. But seriously, the telling sign that that article has put the cart before the horse is almost at the end of it:
“to understand that vocabulary speaks volumes about prevailing social conditions, and that all our swearing says something very powerful about what a mutually contemptuous, atomised, inarticulate society we’re becoming”
Our society is fucked. A sign of that is that we’re all swearing more. And thus, if we stop swearing our society will be healed? That guy is confusing cause and effect, surely? If we heal our society, people will feel the need to swear less might have been a better conclusion.
(Oh, and thankee for the link)
I was chatting to someone last night and this subject came up. I mentioned that the country is becoming overly vulgar and squalid, and that I expect a Victorianesque lurch back towards social conservatism.
I suggested that this would be most-welcome in about 16-years, around the time my little girl starts dating…
Your daughter is minus three, Aaron?
To be serious, do you not think there has BEEN a Victorianesque lurch back towards social conservatism the last ten years or so? It’s just that we’re actually seeing the stuff that the Victorians didn’t talk about – the seedy underbelly, etc. was still there in Victorian times.
I know the Victorians were actually a bunch of sex pests. I was just playing.
My daughter is one in June. I’m rather hoping I can keep her under wraps for a while yet!
LMAO you’re hoping to stop her dating till she’s seventeen? What’s the weather like in cloud cuckoo land? Don’t you remember being a teenager?
#5
That’s what I’m worried about!
Trying to stop her from dating is the worst possible way of going about assuaging your worries though, that way she will just think you don’t understand and go behind your back. [/stating the obvious]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
33 Comments 96 Comments 13 Comments 14 Comments 62 Comments 21 Comments 22 Comments 11 Comments 23 Comments 8 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » damon posted on Tories try to rehabilitate disgraced advisor » sunny hundal posted on This is what a Labour agenda for women could look like » Alexander posted on Three years on, Israel's blockade is still illegal » Shuggy posted on Am I the world's freest woman? » Shatterface posted on Am I the world's freest woman? » Counterview posted on Tories try to rehabilitate disgraced advisor » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » sally posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » sally posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » blanco posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » captain swing posted on Oona King unveils strong support against Ken » Bob B posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit » LMO posted on Why the coalition is swimming in bullshit |