A weekly roundup of publications, reports, events & articles from the leading UK think tanks.
Even although I’m now having to leave out as much as I’m putting in (see below) I’m conscious this is still quite a lengthy read (certainly by the standard of most blog posts). So each week I’ll flag a ‘must read’ item for those who don’t have the time to read the full post let alone the content it highlights – an entirely subjective choice on my part of course but I’ll endeavour to be as fair and non-partisan about that choice as I can.
This week it has to be the Joseph Rowntree paper “A minimum income standard for Britain: What people think”, touching as it does on issues of relative v’s absolute poverty and making judgements about income levels needed to ‘participate in society’. donpaskini blogged about it on LC here.
As always please flag anything worthy I might have missed. As hinted above I’m now getting regular contact from some of the major think tanks keen to both flag content they want me to highlight and asking for copies of the roundup. To that end I’m going to start issuing an email version among key players (God, I’ve been reading too much of this stuff) in the think tanks and public research bodies. If anyone would like to be included in the email version please let me know via my own blog.
post to del.icio.us |
Compass ::
“..genuine progressives need to be very wary that with the electoral balance shifting rightwards..”
How odd. Genuine progressives?
Distinct from the tribal sorts whose commitment to progress comes second to their hostility to the right.
Think those in the STWC happy to ’support’ the Iranian regime etc….
And this by Christina Odone is a straw-man if I saw one:
Today’s class warriors are bent on portraying faith schools as boutique education, the exclusive preserves of pushy middleclass parents. Yet for low-income parents, these schools represent the only way their children can be taught the faith that their own family holds dear. Would a government that prides itself on its egalitarian instincts block opportunities for the poor while securing them exclusively for the rich?”·
Yes, sure, some low income parents are helped I’m sure. But then that just says that faith schools have become the modern grammar schools, and the faithful are using the outdated arguments that the tories have tried – that they help a few low income people and surely you’re not against them being helped are you?, without regarding the fact that still overwhelmingly help middle class people who are willing to play the system.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
No Comments 66 Comments 20 Comments 13 Comments 10 Comments 18 Comments 4 Comments 25 Comments 49 Comments 31 Comments |
![]() |
LATEST COMMENTS » Miss E. J. Frogster posted on Complete tits » Sarah AB posted on Complete tits » Blackberries posted on Complete tits » Shatterface posted on How bad is the feline obesity crisis? » Shatterface posted on Complete tits » McDuff posted on Why I'm defending Ed Balls over immigration » damon posted on Complete tits » Sunny Hundal posted on Complete tits » sunny hundal posted on Why don't MPs pay back tuition fees instead of increasing ours? » Lee Griffin posted on The Labour leadership's token contender.. and it's not Diane Abbott » Paris Gourtsoyannis posted on Why don't MPs pay back tuition fees instead of increasing ours? » dan posted on Defend the urban fox! » Richard W posted on Boris rise for Living Wage left of Labour » Julian Swainson posted on How many cabinet MPs went to private schools? » sally posted on Complete tits |