Home Westminster UnionsMedia Activism

Reshuffling towards oblivion


by Septicisle    
October 4, 2008 at 10:36 am

It’s difficult to overstate just how desperate the cabinet reshuffle shows Gordon Brown as being. Desperate both to win the next election and desperate also to attempt to show that there really isn’t any difference of opinion any longer between the Blairites and the Brownites. Desperate times may call for desperate measures, but the rehabilitation of Peter Mandelson, who for over a decade could not stand the sight of Brown, let alone work with him, was not the way to go about it.

This is not because Mandelson is the uber-Blairite, that he was one of a whole bevy of habitual liars, that he, more than Alastair Campbell, helped to establish the current political culture of spin that has so demeaned politics in the eye of the public, but because he is simply the wrong man at the wrong time. Very few dispute that Mandelson as a minister was effective and good at what he did, whether he was at business, his old and new job, Northern Ireland or as European Commissioner, but there is one quote that more than ever suggests that this is not his moment. He, along with Blair, declared to the City that he and New Labour were “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich.” Well, they did, while everyone else didn’t, and now this is the man to spearhead Brown’s new regulatory agenda. Jesus wept.

Brown’s lack of new ideas could not be more summed up by this latest relaunch. It’s almost as if it was 1997 again, just with Brown in Blair’s position: we’ve got Derek Draper back advising, Alastair Campbell quite clearly helping out but doing so from the sidelines and Peter Mandelson, ennobled and in the cabinet. All we need is for Brown to bring back Lord Levy to glad-hand the business folk and it’ll be as if we’ve gone back to the future. Nick Brown, the uber-Brownite to the Mandelson’s uber-Blairite, is even back as chief whip. The problem with it is obvious: 1997 is long gone, and so are the benign circumstances of that year.

The counter to that argument has been the setting-up of the economic council, half-stuffed with somewhat sympathetic businessmen, but still those that got us into this mess, and the other half with the, err, politicians that got us into this mess. The disastrous appointment of Digby “sod the workers” Jones as the minister for trade, now to be the council’s ambassador, hardly inspires confidence that this will be anything more than a talking shop where the most limited possible re-regulation will be rubber-stamped, all while sticking two fingers up at the PLP, just as Jones’s initial appointment did.

If that wasn’t rewarding failure enough, then Margaret Beckett’s appointment as minister of state for housing is almost tragicomedy. Having presided over the cocking up of the CAP payments to farmers while head of DEFRA, whilst being easily the worst foreign secretary of Labour’s reign, she will doubtless have much to offer just as the repossessions spiral out of control. John Hutton, who was reprising Mandelson’s filthy rich line earlier in the year moves to defence, while Des Browne returns to the backbenches, quite possibly because like Ruth Kelly he intends to vote against the Human Fertilisation and Embryology bill when it comes back before the house. Kelly incidentally is standing down as an MP as well, probably because she knows full well the Tories will be taking her seat in any event.

Jon Cruddas, meanwhile, heavily tipped to take the housing job, apparently declined because Gordon was unwilling to countenance the council house building programme which Cruddas believes necessary. Downing Street has denied he was offered any job whatsoever, which ought to tell its own story.

Whilst the day’s manoeuvrings do show just how desperate Brown is, they also prove that for now the attempts to overthrow him have been delayed, if not put entirely on ice. Whether it was because he did enough at the Labour conference or because of the financial meltdown earlier this week, which even prompted the Conservatives to come over all bi-partisan, is less clear. If the rumours that Hazel Blears and especially the female ministers in the cabinet were the ones moving to wield the knife, they still all remain except for Kelly, but have been undeniably weakened. The next big challenge is the Glenrothes by-election, which few still believe that Labour can hold. It may well come down to how big the defeat is that decides whether the move is back on, but no one can claim the Brown is anything other than further personally weakened by having to bring the old team back together.


-------------------------

  Tweet  

About the author
'Septicisle' is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He mostly blogs, poorly, over at Septicisle.info on politics and general media mendacity.
· Other posts by Septicisle

Filed under
Blog ,Labour party ,Westminster


9 responses in total   ||  



Reader comments

Isn’t there a sinking ship element too? In that the central fact about Mandelson and Beckett is that should Labour lose the next general election their careers are over. For Cruddas- if Labour lose- he has a good chance for senior office or a possibility of the leadership. To some extent I can’t see why you would want to be a high profile minister in domestic policy under Brown at the moment- given that the economy is heading downwards and probably the political fortune sof the Labour party too

He, along with Blair, declared to the City that he and New Labour were “intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich.” Well, they did, while everyone else didn’t

“everyone else didn’t” may be a popular meme, but it’s still bollocks. Labour did a pretty good job of allowing City people to get filthy rich whilst also allowing almost everyone else to do financially very well: http://www.poverty.org.uk/04/index.shtml

Mandy was there at the beginning, here’s back for the end. Some poetic symmetry in that I guess…

john: you are of course right, that was a rhetorical flourish which went a little too far. Certainly the middle classes have enjoyed a decade of virtually unprecedented financial stability, but those which Labour promised to help the most have not done anywhere near as well.

5. douglas clark

john b,

I doubt that the figures you quote reflect capitalisation, which the top 10% are very good at accquiring, and the bottom 10% have no conception of. The statistics you quote are all about income, and nothing to do with assets?

It would be interesting to know if money gained in a city bonus 10 years ago that went directly to something appreciable, like a house in a good area, was not, perhaps, worth a damn sight more in the capitalisation of the rich, than the poor who couldn’t even but a basement flat in the area. I suspect it would be.

Income is really not the name of the game. It is overall wealth that is.

I’d imagine, john b, that if you had an enormous estate somewhere, with production facilities and the like, on that estate you could live like a lord and not have an income at all. Which is, of course the ambition of any free born man. And if you did need to buy anything, you’d probably just barter for it.

As you ought to appreciate, income, in a taxable form is an irrelevance to a truly rich man.

He or she can avoid it, if they want to.

Despite their resources, oil and gas and suchlike, being overseas, it seems to me that the creme de la creme of our plutocracy live in exactly that grace and favour hidden dimension of our reality.

So, it might be bollocks, but is more complicated bollocks than you’d lead a good pleb to believe.

Hmm. You’re right, kinda, but it’s basically only relevant to the top 10% – for everyone else, wealth is a house and a pension at best. And “fucking the top 10%” is not a policy goal in its own right (rather, the point is to tax them to the extent where you get the maximum revenue without them running off to Dubai, Dublin or New York).

the point is to tax them to the extent where you get the maximum revenue without them running off to Dubai, Dublin or New York).

Or preferring lower stress, lower income jobs, or doing less work, or being paid in something less easily taxable, etc…


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Reshuffle Thoughts… | Ministry of Truth

    [...] this reshuffle could be viewed as an act of desperation, and that may conceivable prove to be the case – but necessity, not to mention desperation, is [...]

  2. Berta Lloyd

    Liberal Conspiracy » Reshuffling towards oblivion http://tinyurl.com/yjkezft



Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES
TwitterRSS feedsRSS feedsFacebook


26 Comments



70 Comments



410 Comments



44 Comments



46 Comments



24 Comments



25 Comments



26 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Polleetickle posted on More evidence of police brutality emerges

» World Peace posted on Media warned over next WikiLeaks story

» JC posted on Netroots UK - organising and planning a longer fightback

» Rolo Tamasi posted on More evidence of police brutality emerges

» Morgan Dalton posted on Shocking video: when police charged into students on horses

» Richard P posted on Hughes still 'undecided' on tuition fees vote

» Pascal Uccelli posted on More evidence of police brutality emerges

» Bob B posted on How Michael Gove will dumb down teacher training, and schools

» Yonmei posted on More evidence of police brutality emerges

» Neil K. Sheridan posted on Shocking video: when police charged into students on horses

» Dave Semple posted on How Michael Gove will dumb down teacher training, and schools

» Bob B posted on Do Tories not believe in social mobility any more?

» luther posted on More evidence of police brutality emerges

» Fredrik Walloe posted on More evidence of police brutality emerges

» Broken OfBritain posted on Netroots UK - organising and planning a longer fightback