Home Westminster UnionsMedia Activism

London 2012: Cheap ‘n’ quiet


by Aaron Murin-Heath    
October 7, 2008 at 2:20 pm

BJ the Mayor Bear has told MPs that he expects London 2012 to be “cosier” than this summer’s Olympics in Beijing. Considering the current economic woes, and the enormous scale of the Beijing games, surely this is something of a no-brainer?

From the BBC ::

Updating MPs on progress, the London mayor pledged to deliver a games “every bit as good as Beijing” without spending “colossal” sums of money.

He repeated his vow that the event would not go over its £9.3bn budget.

In light of the financial problems experienced building London’s other major “event” developments – Wembley Stadium and the Millennium Dome, you’ll forgive me if I remain sceptical that budgets can be honoured.


-------------------------
Share this article
          post to del.icio.us

About the author
Aaron Murin-Heath is a regular contributor. He is a writer based in Newark-on-Trent and Tallinn, Estonia. He is both socially and economically liberal. Aaron blogs at tygerland.net.
· Other posts by Aaron Murin-Heath

Filed under
Blog , London Mayor , Sport


4 responses in total   ||  



Reader comments

I share your scepticism to a degree, on the other hand:
1) the Dome was actually built to time and budget, just the exhibition inside wasn’t any good
2) construction’s going to be in its worst recession for decades over the next 4 years, so contractors and staff bidding up costs aren’t going to be as much of a problem as expected when the bid was made

2. Aaron Heath

Okay the construction aspect of the MD may have gone to plan, but the project itself – the dome as a going concern and the £1m-per-month maintenance costs over the 6-years it sat empty, suggests we have a lot to worry about.

construction’s going to be in its worst recession for decades over the next 4 years

Excellent point.

However, regardless of the supply and demand of construction workers (also remember major projects are probably already approved), the urgency of completion may give power to the construction companies, who in a difficult market, may see the Olympic park as a cash cow.

I hope you’re right, John.

3. Mike Killingworth

The problem is that if a project has to be completed by a certain time, you can’t maintain cost control.

4. Adam Bienkov

It’s important to remember that the budget was set long before Boris was elected and contains over a billion pounds worth of contingency.

Boris isn’t actually announcing anything new here.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs


    Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

     
    Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

    You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or rss feeds.
    RECENT OPINION ARTICLES
    TwitterRSS feedsRSS feedsFacebook
    66 Comments



    20 Comments



    13 Comments



    10 Comments



    18 Comments



    4 Comments



    25 Comments



    49 Comments



    31 Comments



    16 Comments



    LATEST COMMENTS
    » Blackberries posted on Complete tits

    » Shatterface posted on How bad is the feline obesity crisis?

    » Shatterface posted on Complete tits

    » McDuff posted on Why I'm defending Ed Balls over immigration

    » damon posted on Complete tits

    » Sunny Hundal posted on Complete tits

    » sunny hundal posted on Why don't MPs pay back tuition fees instead of increasing ours?

    » Lee Griffin posted on The Labour leadership's token contender.. and it's not Diane Abbott

    » dan posted on Defend the urban fox!

    » Richard W posted on Boris rise for Living Wage left of Labour

    » Julian Swainson posted on How many cabinet MPs went to private schools?

    » sally posted on Complete tits

    » Joanne Dunn posted on How many cabinet MPs went to private schools?

    » Lovely Lynnette Peck posted on How many cabinet MPs went to private schools?

    » Nick posted on Why don't MPs pay back tuition fees instead of increasing ours?