I went to a meeting last night at the House of Commons about abortion rights and the up-coming amendments to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. At the meeting I heard some very moving stories about the experience of women in Northern Ireland.
For instance a woman who was told after having a child that if she became pregnant again she could lose her eyesight. Then her contraception failed but under Northern Irish law since she only MIGHT go blind she was not able to access abortion. Instead in desperation she borrowed money from a loan shark to pay to travel to England for a private abortion, leaving her life further at risk from trying to pay back the cost (which typically ranges from £600 to £2000) at interest rates of 150%.
Another story was about a pro-choice meeting in a poor urban area to which a large group of young women came. One of them was heavily pregnant, the rest her family and friends. She had been told by doctors months earlier that the child she was carrying was so seriously disabled that there was no way it would survive at all after birth. But since it wasn’t putting her life at risk she was not allowed an abortion and was being forced to carry the dying foetus to full term.
I didn’t even realise until quite recently that the 1967 act which legalised abortion in England, Wales and Scotland did not extend to Northern Ireland. Abortion is illegal in Northern Ireland unless the mother’s life is at risk. There is no exception made for rape or incest victims. 6,217 women who gave addresses in Ireland had an abortion in Britain last year, others travel to Holland or Belgium and some have been known to order abortion-inducing medicines online, which is dangerous both because not all websites selling such things are safe and also because women convicted of causing an abortion in Northern Ireland can face long prison terms.
Since 1967 five women are known to have died as a result of backstreet abortions in Northern Ireland. This means of course that the system effectively just penalises those women without the financial means to go overseas for their termination. In the next two weeks we have a once-in a-generation chance to change that.
Diane Abbott has tabled an amendment to the HFE Bill which will be voted on on Oct 22nd which would extend the 1967 abortion act to cover Northern Ireland.
You can help to ensure that this legislation goes through. Firstly, and most importantly – write to your MP. Just click here and put in your postcode and the site will allow you to do it all online. Alternatively write to them at the House Of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA. You can put it in your own words or copy a model letter from the Abortion Rights website here.
And once you’ve done that there are three more people you can reasonably write to… You can write to Diane Abbott and thank her for putting the amendment forward, you can write to Gordon Brown (10 Downing Street and/or by signing this petition) and ask him to support the modernisation of the abortion law, he’s pretty desperate for public approval at the moment and his backing would make it much easier for other Labour Party MPs to back the amendments. And finally you can write to Harriet Harman () who is Minister for Women and urge her to put her weight behind the amendments (rather than wimping out and abstaining).
Oh and of course you can also forward this to your friends and family and encourage them to do the same. We have a two week window to sort this out, what happens now will be with us for years to come.
Thanks for reading this and taking action. It’s so important we do it right now!
—-
PS. Here’s some stuff you may have heard elsewhere:
1) Shouldn’t the Northern Irish politicians make the decisions about what happens in Northern Ireland? No. This is about human rights. Women cannot hope for equality in our society until they have full rights over their own bodies. When Northern Irish politicians tried to get an exception to the anti-discrimination laws covering homosexuality – we over-ruled because it was a human rights issue. Also when other amendments covering abortion in England, Wales and Scotland were voted on a few months ago – the Northern Irish MPs all voted to restrict abortion rights for other women in the UK even though it did not affect N.I.
2) But if the people of Northern Ireland don’t want abortion rights, why should we force them on them? A majority of people in Northern Ireland do support abortion rights for women. It’s just their politicians who are stuck in the 19th century.
3) I can’t support abortion because of my religion. The nearest the bible comes to mentioning abortion is in Isaiah where it says if two men are fighting and a woman is hit causing her to miscarry the man who hit the woman must pay a fine to the woman’s husband. I’m not sure that’s the law we need but it would actually be better than the one we’ve got. Anyway the bible says you shouldn’t blaspheme, eat shellfish or share a bed with your husband during your period. Should we pass these as laws and enforce them with lengthy prison sentences? Do we want a country where people of non-christian faiths and of no religion are forced to practice fundamentalist Christianity by law? Even when they are pregnant following incestuous rape? Really?
4) Could this affect the peace process? Oh come on. If this was about the sectarian divide in N. I. you would expect that the Unionists would want to have the same laws as England, Wales and Scotland. They don’t, politicians on both sides oppose abortion rights for women.
5) I heard they did a deal over the 42 days detention. This may be true – we don’t know. There is a rumour that Gordon Brown may have offered the Northern Irish politicians a “deal” that if they support his 42 day detention laws, he will encourage his party to block abortion rights in N.I. Oh good so the rights of police suspects are trampled all over AND the rights of women in N.I. to chose what happens to their own bodies are trampled all over. Lets reject the 42-day detention thing AND insist on abortion rights for women in N.I.
6) The HFE Bill isn’t the right place to amend abortion law. The 1967 abortion law is significantly out of date. Not only with the exception made for Northern Ireland but also the requirement in the rest of the UK for two doctors signatures (you don’t even need two doctor’s signatures for triple heart bypass surgery), that nurses can’t prescribe abortion pills (though they can prescribe may much more complicated drug treatments and if the law was changed in this area many women would have much less distance to travel to access abortion services) and the law which says that medical abortion cannot be completed at home (women have to take the pills in a clinic and either wait there around four hours until the induced miscarriage starts or risk heading home knowing bleeding could start at any time). Since it came in there has been only one opportunity to update it – in 1990. This is the second opportunity to do so we’ve had in over 40 years. These
things come round once in a generation, we could soon have a Tory government and people like Ann Widdicombe will be straight on their high horses seizing every opportunity to rip women’s rights away from them. We’ve got to do it now. If we can get it onto the HFE Bill – great. Oh and by the way there are also other amendments tabled which would do away with the two doctors business and allow nurses to administer medical abortions and women to take the tablets at home if they prefer. See the abortion rights website for info on supporting those amendments too.
7) The government will do the right thing won’t they? I can’t really make any difference can I? The tiny minority of anti-choice campaigners in the UK have massive resources and apparently limitless energy. MPs have been sent plastic foetuses in carrier bags. Mailbags are filling up with angry letters calling those who promote women’s rights “murderers” and worse. We are the majority and we need to let politicians know we support women’s rights, that the issue is important to us and ask them to do the same.
post to del.icio.us |
Great post, Kate, thanks.
She had been told by doctors months earlier that the child she was carrying was so seriously disabled that there was no way it would survive at all after birth. But since it wasn’t putting her life at risk she was not allowed an abortion and was being forced to carry the dying foetus to full term.
How twisted are their ‘morals’ to make the mother suffer so?
If the case in question was the fetus that was to be born without a brain, I think eventually they did let the girl leave the country and have an abortion, but the fact that she had to fight for it, and that they even assigned a *lawyer* to the fetus at one point makes me want to punch things.
They would have made her have that baby only to watch it die. That is abuse, any way you slice it.
and that they even assigned a *lawyer* to the fetus at one point makes me want to punch things
Sorry? They did what…?
That’s not only perverse but ultra vires.
A foetus is not a person in law and has no right to legal representation, which make that an abuse of due process.
Unity:
http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2007/05/03/irish_teen_asks_judge_to_allow_abortion/
And it infuriates me too. They were going to defend a fetus that would be born, gurgle for a few minutes and then die.
Anyone who can’t see how insane that is needs carting off to the asylum.
Gina:
Thanks – that’s the Irish Republic not Northern Ireland but it does exemplify the bizarre lengths that anti-abortionists will go to in order to force their agenda on others, but at least the Irish Supreme Court can to the right decision in the end…
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6639673.stm
What I find bizzare are the thoughts that go through the heads of the judges involved in these cases. Imagine you are a crown court judge sentencing a woman for seeking an abortion in Northern Ireland, a part of the UK, knowing that a woman 40 miles across the water in Scotland, another part of the UK, would be doing absolutely nothing wrong.
If the government really did cut a deal over abortion with Unionists to force through the 42 day motion then I do wonder if there are any levels the government wont stoop to.
The abortion debate is a con. It is not abortion these people hate, but SEX. They hate the idea of people having sex out side of marriage . The anti abortion movement in the US will tell you that abortion is just the start. Once they get that banned, then, they want contreception banned.
Why do you think they have started these movements of fathers who want their daughters to stay virgins until marriage? Making the pledge to stay pure. Becuase of sex.
It’s all about sex with these people. They are obsessed with it.
Go on, ask your MP to vote to extend the abortion act to cover Northern Ireland: http://tinyurl.com/4sjtg5
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
8 Comments 66 Comments 20 Comments 13 Comments 10 Comments 18 Comments 4 Comments 25 Comments 49 Comments 31 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Flowerpower posted on His best speech ever? Jon Cruddas on how Labour needs to reinvent itself » john b posted on How bad is the feline obesity crisis? » Mike Killingworth posted on Complete tits » Dick the Prick posted on Ashcroft to launch "devastating" attack on Cameron » Sarah AB posted on Complete tits » tim f posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » TJC posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » TJC posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » BenSix posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » Barry Tebb posted on Blog Nation: what would you like to see discussed? » JonSHarvey posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » JonSHarvey posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » VS posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? » Mark Cooper posted on Ashcroft to launch "devastating" attack on Cameron » JonSHarvey posted on What would you ask the Labour leader candidates? |