What is Israel’s motivation?
Perhaps the most dispiriting aspect of the invasion of the Gaza Strip is the utter pointlessness of the exercise; while military victory is all but certain, at every other level, Israel can only be the loser.
Decades of refusal to allow Palestinians their legitimate political rights has not left it even marginally more secure, and its current savage actions will only serve further to galvanise support for Hamas.
The brutalities that the Israel Defense Forces are perpetrating right now guarantee the rocket launchers and the suicide bombers more recruits then they will know what to do with, for a generation and more to come.
Meanwhile, the 100:1 ratio of the death tolls has horrified liberal opinion everywhere. Even the European Commission is now openly accusing Israel of breaching humanitarian law.
What, then, can possibly be the motivation of Israel’s political establishment for a course of action both murderous in the literal sense and spectacularly misconceived at the strategic level?
One issue is of course the need to restore IDF credibility in the wake of the Lebanon debacle. Then there is the desire of Tzipi Livni and Ehud Barak to out-Netanyahu Netanyahu himself in the run up to general elections next month. Why should they concern themselves with the growing pile of corpses – and they are 99% Palestinian corpses, after all – when such vital issues of credibility are at stake?
Let it be stressed at once that the open admiration for the reactionary Islamists of Hamas – so obviously on display in some quarters of the left – is profoundly misplaced.
Nevertheless, the organisation won the Palestinian elections in 2006 because it articulated opposition to Israeli oppression, and because of popular revulsion at the corruption of the Palestinian Authority. That gives it an undeniable popular mandate and makes it central to the quest for a solution, whether we like that reality or not.
Opinions as to what constitutes a viable settlement to the Palestine question differ, and at times like this, all of them seem somewhat chimeric. But a precondition of ever reaching one is an Israeli leadership that is both aware of the extent of the injustices meted out since 1948 and determined to rectify them. That is clearly not the Israeli leadership we see right now.
---------------------------
Tweet |
Dave Osler is a regular contributor. He is a British journalist and author, ex-punk and ex-Trot. Also at: Dave's Part
· Other posts by Dave Osler
Filed under
Blog ,Foreign affairs ,Middle East ,Realpolitik
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
The motivation is terror………killing people, and terror.
Sadly, there’s no grudge quite like an ancient grudge.
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/476393
banter
Now that, Alf, is how you engage politically with people that aren’t necessarily in to politics.
Former Blair adviser Matthew Taylor has an interesting article on the failure of political leadership: http://www.matthewtaylorsblog.com/thersa/the-israeli-action-in-gaza-a-leadership-deficit/
How does Israel stop Hamas firing rockets at it’s towns- 5000 fired so far? Why does Hamas fire it’s rockets and stores it’s weapons in built up areas? There is plenty of open space in Gaza where rockets could be fired from and weapons stored where civilians would not be put at risk.
Why did Hamas murder members of FATAH in Gaza?
Perhaps it is time to detonate a love bomb, well over due i think.
“How does Israel stop Hamas firing rockets at it’s towns- 5000 fired so far? Why does Hamas fire it’s rockets and stores it’s weapons in built up areas? There is plenty of open space in Gaza where rockets could be fired from and weapons stored where civilians would not be put at risk.
Why did Hamas murder members of FATAH in Gaza?”
Who cares, “He started it” is barely a credible argument for a 5 year old.
“How does Israel stop Hamas firing rockets at it’s towns- 5000 fired so far? Why does Hamas fire it’s rockets and stores it’s weapons in built up areas? There is plenty of open space in Gaza where rockets could be fired from and weapons stored where civilians would not be put at risk.”
Or: ‘It’s not fair! Why can’t they fight like a regular army (even though they’re not, and can’t be) so we can kill them more easily?’
7. Lee Griffin . Personally I think Israel’s tactics will produce a long term problem for them. However, unless an alternative strategy is devised to stop Hamas and Islamic Jihad rockets being targeted at Israeli towns then noone will stop Israel’s assault on Gaza. Hamas is supported by Iran who has on number of occasions threatened to destroy Israel. As they said in WW2 “Foolish talk costs lives”. The continuous bellicose comments by Iran, Hamas and Hizbollah undermines moderate opinion in Israel. Hamas threatening to kill Jewish chilldren anywhere in the World is only going to make Israel more determined . I do not know of any WW2 resistance group which created bases/supply dumps near to civilians . The only time when death of children was accepted by resistance groups as an acceptable part of the fight was when the RAF , using mosquitos destroyed the walls of a prison next to a school with the aim of enabling resistance leaders to escape. The government in exile of that country made the final decision allowing the operation to proceed knowing that children were likely to die.
Would not all the money and time spent by Hamas on weapons and conflict be better spent on water and sewage treatment, healthcare and education ? FATAH has misused vasts sums of money . Would ‘nt a Hamas government producing a well run administration with a better quality sewage treatment, water supply, electricity supply , healthcare , education and a more rapidly growing economy be a better way of showing Hamas as preferable to FATAH when it cpme to government?
“Would not all the money and time spent by Hamas on weapons and conflict be better spent on water and sewage treatment, healthcare and education ?”
It almost certainly would, except maybe Hamas are libertarians and don’t believe the state should spend money on anything except weapons.
(actually one reason for the popularity of Hamas has been precisely that it provided healthcare, education and welfare services even whilst not in power, and the PLO was failing to do so).
I think that the answer is fairly clear:
http://www.scriboergosum.org.uk/revamp/2124
Get this into your heads: They do not peace. Peace doesn’t suit the Israeli Right & it doesn’t suit the Israeli Centre. Peace obliges dealing with the settler situation, that’s not something the Israeli Right wants to happen and even assuming it is (which you shouldn’t assume) what the centre does it’s not something that they can afford to do.
War suits the Israeli establishment just fine. It’s a central plank of the Kadima re-election strategy, in fact.
Motivation? From their perspective they can’t win; they conceded a Palestinian state, pulled out of Gaza and got precious little in return. As far as they are concerned, Hamas ended its ceasefire and if an organisation you are at war with ends a ceasefire, that means that sooner or later they are going to hurt you; so they got in first.
They do not peace. I’m sure they don’t! But how does one peace?
Israeli elections + Obama not yet inaugurated + Abbas constitutionally obliged to call date of next PA elections = Israel seeking to kill as many Palestinians and destroy as much of Gaza as possible.
But let’s face it, a state of permanent war has suited the Israeli establishment for quite some time now: nationalism forged in the heat of war cries is a useful political tool.
*sighs*
They do not WANT peace.
Oh. I knew that.
as in – I knew that was what you meant, and I was being ironic, and that I was fully aware Israel doesn’t want peace.
The problem when nations believe there is a choice between peace and victory, is that they tend to choose victory – no matter the cost.
Yes, I knew you knew.
Yawn. Im bored of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Face it, theyre not going to stop killing eachother.
The palestinians hate Israelis because their holy book tells them to hate Jews. Theyre also jealous because Jews are so much more successful than they are.
And the Israelis are going to overreact because, being Jews they have been almost completely wiped out on several occasions.
Thats why they’ve been fighting for as long as living memory can recall.
The only sensible solution and the only constructive thing which we could do would be to encourage the surrounding Arab countries to rehouse the Palestinians within their borders. If they really cared about them they would have done this decades ago. Hmm I wonder why they haven’t?
Hmm I wonder why they haven’t?
Maybe because they weren’t responsible for the ethnic cleansing that displaced them?
“Or: ‘It’s not fair! Why can’t they fight like a regular army (even though they’re not, and can’t be) so we can kill them more easily?’”
Hamas firing missiles from within civilian areas contravenes the rules of war, not to mention conventional morality. Moreover, whilst admittedly the Israelis may be very heavy-handed in their approach they are at least attempting/intend to target military objectives, whilst Hamas on the other hand deliberately targets civilians.
Mmm yum-yum,
Brilliant – why can we see things so clearly and nobody else can?
Lilliput
“Maybe because they weren’t responsible for the ethnic cleansing that displaced them?”
Uhh, yes they were! They told them to evacuate so they could get a better shot at the joooos during the war of independence. Then they lost the war and some territory with it.
That’s Zionist fantasy, not history.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» If Murdoch is considering selling his papers, who would buy them?
» Labour’s last ditch attempt to expose the NHS Risk Register today
» Sorry Cardinal O’Brien, but reality is redefining itself
» Why Jenny Tonge had to go for her comments on Israel
» The Daily Mail blames the EU for Indian workers too
» Five things you need to know about the Legal Aid Bill
» How Workfare trapped charities into offering free labour
» Ladies and gentlemen, brace yourself for war between Iran and Israel
» The Occupy saga shows why the Church is becoming irrelevant
» March is ‘Move Your Money’ month – this is how it works
» A small victory in the campaign against Workfare! But what now?
1 Comment 6 Comments 12 Comments 70 Comments 72 Comments 256 Comments 16 Comments 25 Comments 38 Comments 200 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Julie posted on Just wait until November and see how policing changes » Sunny Hundal posted on Women's groups mobilise against anti-abortion 'prayer vigil' » damon posted on Sorry Cardinal O'Brien, but reality is redefining itself » Chaise Guevara posted on Women's groups mobilise against anti-abortion 'prayer vigil' » Paul Ashby posted on Women's groups mobilise against anti-abortion 'prayer vigil' » Chaise Guevara posted on Outrage as Oxford Uni hosts homophobes » Chaise Guevara posted on Sorry Cardinal O'Brien, but reality is redefining itself » Chaise Guevara posted on Sorry Cardinal O'Brien, but reality is redefining itself » john b posted on If Murdoch is considering selling his papers, who would buy them? » John V. Keogh posted on Watch: Lansley caught running from doctors » SomersetChris posted on Boris deputy intervened to stop hacking inquiry » LibertarianLou posted on Boris deputy intervened to stop hacking inquiry » Just wait until November and see how policing changes | Liberal Conspiracy posted on Boris deputy intervened to stop hacking inquiry » Buckweat posted on How useful is Tesco's u-turn on Workfare? » Arthur Seaton posted on Outrage as Oxford Uni hosts homophobes |