Fred Goodwin should be stripped of his knighthood


2:14 am - March 13th 2009

by Sunder Katwala    


Tweet       Share on Tumblr

Good luck to Martin Salter, who has tabled a motion calling for the forfeiture committee to meet to consider stripping Not-Sir Fred Goodwin of his knighthood. Salter says this to Paul Waugh of the Standard.

Sir Fred Goodwin is a symbol of corporate greed and the honours system is there to reward service not selfishness. There’s clearly a powerful case for his refusal to hand back his knightood to be considered by the Forfeiture Committee in order to preserve the integrity of the honours system.

About which I have only one complaint.

Why is Salter still using the title himself? I fully support his bid to get the knighthood formally revoked. But perhaps there is a role for civic society here too. And so my modest proposal is that the progressive blogosphere, Labour MPs and others who wish to signal their disapproval should immediately adopt the new style “Not-Sir Fred Goodwin” while the matter is being pursued and addressed.

The workings of the forfeiture committee must be one of the less well known corners of our constitution. Waugh notes it is “an obscure body comprised of the Cabinet Secretary, Tresaury Solicitor, Perm Sec at the Home Office and Perm Sec of the Scottish Executive”.

Even we Fabian gradualists might doubt whether that will prove a hotbed of radical pressure. But could and should they ignore a Parliamentary resolution or motion which had majority support, particularly from various sides of the House?

Or might Not-Sir Fred prove amenable to a sensible compromise after all?

  Tweet   Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  


About the author
Sunder Katwala is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is the director of British Future, a think-tank addressing identity and integration, migration and opportunity. He was formerly secretary-general of the Fabian Society.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: Blog ,Economy ,Media

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. Shatterface

You could take a leaf out of Prince’s book and call him ‘the Goodwin formerly known as Sir’

Anyway, I believe Martin Salter is a dangerous and illiberal MP who has happily spread rumours and outright falsehoods in the past so long as it gets him some nice coverage in the tabloids, something I don’t imagine members of this website appreciate. I am referring, in particular, to his stewardship of the recent anti-pornography law, which was not evidenced based and involved hyping up the dangers that the internet and free sexual expression pose.

Having said that, I would happily put those grievances aside and support the motion, so long as “not-sir Derek Wanless” were added to a potentially long list of bankers/establishment stooges to be stripped of their honours: http://www.order-order.com/2009/03/gordons-favourite-banker-has-14-million.html

Just to be fair.

3. Graham Smith

Salter sunk his own argument pretty quickly by saying; “the honours system is there to reward service not selfishness”. Since when?

Strip the lot of them of their so-called ‘honours’ and let’s start again.

Would that be “the avaricious, amoral and universally-disgraced, Not-Sir Fred Goodwin”?

Didn’t the honours system grow out of the need to reward mercenaries (a la Swiss Guards), colonial invaders and pirates?

@2: yes. Anyone who supported the ‘jailing people who film consenting bondage’ law is a far worse threat to society than a mildly crooked banker.

@4, yes. Fred Goodwin is entirely within the spirit of the honours system; removing his knighthood is akin to repealing the Act of Settlement in terms of ‘utter point-missing’.

6. Ed Watterson

Interesting debate. When this forfeiture committee meet, they could be burning midnight oil. In addition to Not-Sir Fred Goodwin, there is also Not-Sir Derek Wanless and Not-Sir James Crosby to also consider. Having created all this work for the committee, I trust that GB will pay for the tea and sandwiches needed to sustain them through their long deliberations.

An interesting footnote about Not-Sir Derek Wanless concerns his various biog’s. His 7 year stint at Northern Rock has been completetly airbrushed from his history ! There is much glowing reference however to his 1st in Maths from Cambridge. May I suggest he considers enrolling on a 6 month maths teacher training course. He, better than anyone, should know that debs need repaying !

This is childish. The Honours system is devalued on the one hand by the populist showering of honours on celebrities and sportspeople and on the other by attention seeking calls for the withdrawal from people who performed to the best of their ability with disastrous results.

Do you strip the confetti honours from the footballer who goes on to miss the shootout?

Anyway, if stripped he would be the first person to have sold his honour for a pension.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    New post: Fred Goodwin should be stripped off his knighthood http://tinyurl.com/ajqksb

  2. Liberal Conspiracy

    New post: Fred Goodwin should be stripped off his knighthood http://tinyurl.com/ajqksb

  3. Liz Walder

    We said this weeks ago: http://tinyurl.com/ajqksb





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.