What direction will Israel take now?


by Ben White    
June 2, 2009 at 12:21 pm

Three pieces of legislation proposed recently by members of Israel’s Knesset have been making headlines: banning the commemoration of the Nakba; introducing a mandatory ‘loyalty oath’ to the Zionist state; and criminalising public declarations of opposition to Israel being a ‘Jewish state’.

None of these efforts may actually become law – the loyalty oath has already been voted down by the cabinet’s law committee. The Nakba bill though has now been tweaked, so that rather than straightforwardly outlawing any events, there will be economic sanctions for the local authorities and organisations involved.

The response in the Western media to the sight of of 47 MKs voting for prison sentences for anti-Zionists has often come in the form of a warning that Israel is in danger of turning into a racist state. Taking into account other authoritarian trends, this assessment sees Israel’s democracy as under threat by the far-right groupings within Netanyahu’s government.

But there is only an element of truth here, and far more that misleads. Israel is not in danger of becoming a racist state, because it already is one. That such a statement can still shock is testament to Israel’s propaganda efforts over the years in promulgating the ‘Middle East’s Only Democracy’ myth.

In Israel, its own Palestinian citizens are forbidden from buying certain land, or living in particular communities, while para-state bodies (like the Jewish Agency or Jewish National Fund) are constitutionally mandated to privilege Jews. Fundamentally, of course, creating and maintaining a Jewish state continues to require the denationalisation of the ethnically cleansed Palestinians who are forbidden from returning on account of their not being Jewish.

That is all without even considering the fact that for the last 42 years Israel has been subjecting millions of Palestinians to the military rule of an apartheid regime of ethnic separation and land confiscation. As Roane Carey noted in The Nation last week, “how can a state that imprisons 4 million Palestinians behind ghetto walls, bypass roads and a blockade, and treats another 1.5 million as second-class citizens, be democratic?”

There is, though, something new in these developments. Since 1948, Israel has been careful to mask the state’s intrinsic discrimination, and has seen no need to resort to the kind of blatant racism of separate public toilets – what Uri Davis has called ‘petty apartheid’.

There is now evidence of a turn towards openly racist legislation; see, for example, the Citizenship and Entry in Israel Law, applied since 2003, which bars family unification between Palestinians from the Occupied Territories and Palestinian citizens of Israel. There is also an increased intolerance towards dissent, and now, the legislative proposals of fanatical ruling parties.

Some have claimed that Netanyahu could do a ‘Nixon-to-China’ peace bid, securing the kind of deal a more dovish government could not. What seems more likely is that a hard right Knesset majority will bring out into the open the latent racism that’s always been there.

Netanyahu himself, with his demand that the Palestinians recognise Israel as a Jewish state and the Palestinian refusal to do so, may also unwittingly draw attention to the problem with this formulation – a problem that goes to the core of the conflict more than talk of outposts, ‘natural growth’ and confidence-building measures ever could.


---------------------------
  Tweet    


About the author
This is a guest article. Ben White is a freelance journalist who has written for Guardian's CIF, Electronic Intifada and others. His book 'Israeli Apartheid: A Beginner's Guide' (Pluto Press), was published in 2009.
· Other posts by
Filed under
Blog ,Foreign affairs ,Middle East ,Realpolitik


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. John Meredith

Oh lord, not the ‘Israel is an apartheid state’ meme again. Don’t you realise how insulting this is to those who suffered apartheid?

“Oh lord, not the ‘Israel is an apartheid state’ meme again. Don’t you realise how insulting this is to those who suffered apartheid?”

Does that shield Israel from criticism? It could be called the mini-me apartheid state. Or it could dismantle it’s own racist policies.

“own Palestinian citizens are forbidden from buying certain land, or living in particular communities”.

Where is this happening? In the settlements or more widely?

Nick –

Haven’t got loads of time right now, but just to give a bit of a better idea…The Jewish National Fund (JNF) directly owns 13 percent of the land in Israel, a Zionist body whose self-professed loyalty is “to the Jewish people”. The JNF also has an important stake in the Israel Lands Administration (ILA), which manages 93 percent of Israel’s land.

Then there are the ‘selection committees’:

“According to official figures, around 89% of all towns and villages in Israel are classified as Jewish. Palestinian Arab citizens of the state are excluded from purchasing leasing rights in approximately 78% of these towns and villages, which are known as community or agricultural towns. The reason for their exclusion is that “selection committees” monitor applications for housing units in these areas, in order to filter out the Arab population, often finding Arab applicants to be ‘socially unsuitable’ and prevent them from residing in large areas of state-controlled land. Among the criteria that these committees employ is that the applicant be “suited to social life in a small community or agricultural settlement”. In addition, “a senior official from the settlement agency” (the Jewish Agency or the World Zionist Organization) must sit on the selection committee…”
Adalah, http://www.adalah.org/eng/hrw.php

“Selection committees are made up of government and community representatives as well as a senior official in the Jewish Agency or the Zionist Organization, and have notoriously been used to exclude Arabs from living in rural Jewish communities. The state owns the land and the ILA allocates the land to the communities and leases plots to individual residents, on the basis of the committees’ recommendations…”
Human Rights Watch, http://www.hrw.org/reports/2008/iopt0308/4.htm

All of that doesn’t include the fact that post-1948, many Palestinian villages inside Israel (the ones that weren’t destroyed/repopulated) had their land taken for new Jewish villages/towns. By the 1970s, a typical Palestinian community had lost 65-75 percent of its land (from then on off-limits to the Palestinians).

Sounds like more privately owned land would solve the problem in that case. State ownership often leads to political interests influencing distributive outcomes.

6. Cabalamat

a warning that Israel is in danger of turning into a racist state

There is no danger of this happening, since Israel is already a racist state, and always has been.

Don’t you realise how insulting this is to those who suffered apartheid?

Don’t you realise how insulting it is to those who suffered apartheid that more than almost two decades after it ended, another country is still implementing apartheid policies?

8. Cabalamat

Some have claimed that Netanyahu could do a ‘Nixon-to-China’ peace bid, securing the kind of deal a more dovish government could not.

That’d be me.

What seems more likely is that a hard right Knesset majority will bring out into the open the latent racism that’s always been there.

If they do, they may be playing into Obama’s hands. Obama wants Israel to make consessions that would make peace more likely. The USA supports Israel a lot, and without that support, Israel’s security would be threatened. But it would be politically risky for Obama to withdraw that support, unless the American people approve of his decision to. The more Israel becomes extreme and openly racist, the more supprt Obama would have for using withdrawal of support as a threat against Israel. Maybe Obama is giving Lieberman and Netanyahu enough rope to hang themselves; he’s certainly clever enough that this train of thought will have occurred to him.

How is it that this tiny and relatively new Country, Israel, attracts so much attention and passion from people who have no connection with it?
Look at the bigger picture, Israel’s neighbours around the Middle East and Arabian Peninsula who make no secret of their complete lack of human rights, women’s rights and their incitement against Christians and Jews. Why is this much larger subject so unpopular??


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. www.benwhite.org.uk: the blog » Blog Archive » I’m also on Liberal Conspiracy

    [...] But there is only an element of truth here, and far more that misleads. Israel is not in danger of becoming a racist state, because it already is one… [...]





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




9 Comments



20 Comments



15 Comments



74 Comments



17 Comments



110 Comments



12 Comments



95 Comments



36 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» the a&e charge nurse posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» Cylux posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» Just Visiting posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Channel 4 covers 'disabled dating'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» Just Visiting posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» NindyPurba posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» Mr A James posted on Shoddy hack Andrew Gilligan's missing figures

» Jamie posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» Chaise Guevara posted on Channel 4 covers 'disabled dating'

» Chaise Guevara posted on Fathers4Justice launch silly attack on Mumsnet

» Cylux posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» Chaise Guevara posted on Look at the language behind criticism of gay marriage

» sara posted on Channel 4 covers 'disabled dating'

» Cylux posted on Fathers4Justice launch silly attack on Mumsnet