Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police
1:51 pm - August 24th 2009
Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
Organisers of Climate Camp, due to start this week from Wednesday, have issued an open letter to the Met Police.
Watch the video below or read the text.
Open Letter to the Met
Open Letter
FAO Chief Superintendent Ian Thomas,
New Scotland Yard
London SW1H 0BGDear Chief Superintendent Thomas,
On August 17th, you wrote to the Camp for Climate Action, requesting further information on the location of our next Camp, which will take place from August 27th to September 2nd, somewhere in the London area. You say that you require this information in order to help with “community liaison”, to ensure the Camp is a “safe and healthy” event, and to help you put a “pre-planned and proportionate policing operation” in place. We are writing this open letter in order to alleviate your concerns, and to make our position clear both to yourself and to the public.
Community liaison has been a vital part of every Climate Camp. At Drax in 2006, Heathrow in 2007 and Kingsnorth in 2008, we put a lot of time and effort into spending time with local residents and allaying people’s concerns, and this year will be no different. We have a good track record of building community support for the Camp and for climate change campaigning, we’ve already been in touch with local Councils across London, and our friendly outreach volunteers will be chatting to the locals from the moment we arrive on site. We plan to be excellent neighbours for as long as we’re there, we’ll be open and welcoming to any local residents with questions or concerns, and we’ll leave the site spotless when it’s time to go.
As regards health and safety – thanks for your concern, but again we’ve got it under control. As with previous Camps, we’ll have great food, water, compost toilets, a team of medics, a wellbeing space, excellent on-site communication, emergency vehicle access, and a family space. We also have a “Safer Spaces” policy and a “Tranquillity Team” to help keep the site free from oppressive behaviour or aggro. Anyone who’s spent time at past Camps will tell you how friendly and safe the atmosphere is – better than most mainstream festivals.
Of course, there is one unfortunate exception to all of this. While most visitors to previous Camps have had an inspiring and positive experience, some of us have had to suffer violence, intimidation, theft, sleep deprivation and harassment, thanks to past examples of “pre-planned and proportionate policing operations”. Local communities have been disrupted by police road closures and indiscriminate stops-and-searches. Members of the public have been attacked with batons or arrested on trumped-up charges simply for standing on the perimeter of a campsite (nearly all of them have now been acquitted or had their charges dropped). Judging from past experience, the best thing the police could do to ensure the health and safety of the public at Climate Camp 2009 would be to stay as far away from it as possible.
Bearing all of this in mind, I hope that you, and the public, understand why we don’t feel able to reveal the precise location of the Camp at this time. Every other aspect of the Camp has been organised in an open, accountable and democratic way, via monthly public meetings. The only secret is the location. There’s a simple reason for this: I’m afraid we just don’t trust the police. Why? Because it seems as though every time we have a protest, the police turn up and start hitting people. Look what happened at the G20. That’s not really a very good way to win people over.
Just because you’ve started using friendlier language and talking about “lighter-touch” policing, do you really think we’re suddenly going to believe you’re our friends? Just a few weeks back the Big Green Gathering was shut down by the police on spurious grounds, for “political” reasons. If the police are really trying to build up trust within the climate action movement, then that’s a funny way to go about it.
The precise location of the Camp for Climate Action 2009 will be announced via mass text as part of the exciting August 26th “Swoop”. I’m afraid you’ll just have to sign up on our website, and wait for the updates just like everybody else!
Yours sincerely,
The Camp for Climate Action Media Team
via The Daily (Maybe)
Update: Swoop locations now revealed
Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
Chris is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is an aspiring journalist and reports stories for LC.
· Other posts by Chris Barnyard
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Nicely done.
“The public no longer seem to trust us!”
No? Really, officer? Why on earth would that be? Do you think?
“Judging from past experience, the best thing the police could do to ensure the health and safety of the public at Climate Camp 2009 would be to stay as far away from it as possible.”
Great line, and great letter.
I hope no wasps injure the police this year.
Heh. Smacked it.
I’ve also now corrected the bad links in the letter.
A good letter, well argued but with the appropriate level of sarcasm. I’d have been inclined to be ruder.
Today’s Times:
Representatives of Climate Camp have been in talks with the police but the group’s organisers refuse to disclose the location because they fear the police will attempt to disrupt their plans.That sense of mistrust is echoed by many members of the public, according to an opinion poll published yesterday by Christian Aid. The YouGov survey of 2,188 adults found that 50 per cent believe the police are too heavy-handed when dealing with protests and 18 per cent said that they had been put off protesting by police tactics.
Ukliberty quoting the times:
The YouGov survey of 2,188 adults found that 50 per cent believe the police are too heavy-handed when dealing with protests and 18 per cent said that they had been put off protesting by police tactics.
Oh dear. I wish there wasn’t a statistic for that.
Somewhere in a room in Whitehall serious men (they may let women do Gold and Silver commands but this decision will be being made by men, I’m fairly sure) a conversation is being had.
“18%? 18%!? That’s just not good enough, Commissioner. Your target was 50%. Intimidation can’t stop dissent if only 18% of the country are scared of your tactics. Get it together!”
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
-
Liberal Conspiracy
: Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/3J0H9b
-
Mark Taylor
Shared item: Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police: Organisers of Climate Camp, due to start .. http://tinyurl.com/n26yqp
-
anotherwhitemug.com
Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police- More about us here. You can read articles t… http://bit.ly/198v1n
-
Alan Thomas
RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/1X3qf – sad when the police lose public faith
-
Socket
RT @libcon: : Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/3J0H9b
-
Liberal Conspiracy
: Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/3J0H9b
-
Mark Taylor
Shared item: Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police: Organisers of Climate Camp, due to start .. http://tinyurl.com/n26yqp
-
anotherwhitemug.com
Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police- More about us here. You can read articles t… http://bit.ly/198v1n
-
Alan Thomas
RT @libcon Liberal Conspiracy » Climate Camp issue open letter to Met police http://bit.ly/1X3qf – sad when the police lose public faith
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
40 Comments
84 Comments
68 Comments
12 Comments
50 Comments
60 Comments
16 Comments
3 Comments
14 Comments
12 Comments
29 Comments
9 Comments
7 Comments
52 Comments
26 Comments
57 Comments
16 Comments
48 Comments
15 Comments
NEWS ARTICLES ARCHIVE