Republican slams ‘vague’ Tory foreign policy
10:22 pm - September 14th 2009
Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
David Cameron’s foreign policy has come under attack from one of his own side from across the pond.
William Inboden, senior vice-president of the right-wing Legatum Institute and a former senior director for strategic planning on the National Security Council (for the Bush administration), offered scathing criticism on the Foreign Policy website.
He said the administration’s foreign policy plans “remain elusively vague”.
Under different headers he offered scathing words for the shadow administration, saying at one point:
Also thus far lacking among Tory leaders is any substantial geo-strategic analysis of the state of the world. There are the usual platitudes about globalization, the challenge of failing states, balancing interests and ideals, etc. But there is little of sophistication said about the underlying shifts in balances of power, the tension between the nation-state and sub- and trans-national actors, the salience of ideology, or the tectonic forces of history.
Ouch.
Mr Inboden also advises that Michael Gove should take a lead on counter-terrorism. This may placate the neo-conservative wing of the Tories, though it might clash with Cameron’s more pragmatic approach (he admonished Israel last year when it invaded Gaza in a way, which Gove would not do).
He adds:
One gets the inescapable sense that British Conservatives (like Labour) still look to the United States to set much of the foreign policy agenda, irrespective of which president occupies the White House.
Which is unsurprising. It’s likely that Tory foreign policy will be more dictated by Obama’s priorities than Cameron’s.
But he adds, rather cuttingly,
Yet nor are there any Conservative ideas yet advanced that seem compelling in the face of the profound challenges of today’s world, or that inspire hope for a landmark new era in British foreign policy.
Over at the Financial Times, Gideon Rachman says of the article:
Inboden strives to be polite and positive; the Tories are the Republicans’ sister party, after all. But his critique of Conservative thinking on foreign policy is, I think, fairly devastating. Tory thinking comes across as “anemic”, empty and – even – defeatist.
Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
We don’t have an independent foreign policy because we don’t have the muscle or the money to pursue one. That said I’ve always wondered why we don’t use our links with the Commonwealth to turn it into a free trade zone.
2 – Can’t, against EU rules.
Pretty sure the Legatum Institute is in Mayfair – which is not exactly “across the pond”.
Surely the Tory foreign policy will be screw Europe and do whatever the USA tells them – or have I got little Willie and Liam Fox wrong?
I would have rather gone along with France and Germany in the last decade than the USA. The US foriegn policy is now alien to the UKs interests. The USA has its own plans and policies for its own sake not ours.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
-
Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: Republican slams ‘vague’ Tory foreign policy http://bit.ly/DHnEf
-
labourmatters
RT @libcon Republican savages “elusively vague” Tory foreign policy plans: http://bit.ly/T9DmP #whatwouldcamerondo
-
Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: Republican slams ‘vague’ Tory foreign policy http://bit.ly/DHnEf
[Original tweet] -
See, this is why you should read Diplomatic Impunity first and foremost « Diplomatic Impunity
[...] first and foremost 2009 September 14 by Marc Just noticed, via my RSS feeds, that Liberal Conspiracy is talking about William Inboden’s criticisms of Cameron’s foreign [...]
-
labourmatters
RT @libcon Republican savages “elusively vague” Tory foreign policy plans: http://bit.ly/T9DmP #whatwouldcamerondo
[Original tweet] -
Stephen Newton
Republican slams ‘vague’ Tory foreign policy http://bit.ly/xMpL8
[Original tweet]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
177 Comments
28 Comments
24 Comments
84 Comments
40 Comments
34 Comments
28 Comments
58 Comments
75 Comments
21 Comments
13 Comments
16 Comments
47 Comments
115 Comments
38 Comments
17 Comments
44 Comments
121 Comments
27 Comments
NEWS ARTICLES ARCHIVE