Power without responsibility
11:08 am - October 1st 2009
Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
Much excitement over the fact that a right wing newspaper owned by a wealthy foreigner will be urging its readers to vote Tory at the next election.
But I thought this was the most interesting report to come out of it:
It is rumoured that The Sun had made it clear that it would not back the party as long as Dominic Grieve remained Shadow Home Secretary. The previous Sun Editor, Rebekah Wade had made that clear after an unhappy dinner she had had with the man now moved to the Justice portfolio.
That’s not a rumour started by bitter Labour activists, but comes from Tim Montgomerie of Conservative Home. And it isn’t a complaint – Tim seems to think it is perfectly normal that David Cameron would move his ministers if they upset Murdoch’s minions over dinner.
Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
Don Paskini is deputy-editor of LC. He also blogs at donpaskini. He is on twitter as @donpaskini
· Other posts by Don Paskini
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Conservative Party ,Media ,Westminster
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
If these reports are accurate and this were a decent democracy then DC and the Sun would be investigated for corruption.
Whether or not it was that cut and dried, the important point is that Grieve was moved because he’s too liberal. And yet people *still* join/support the Tory party thinking it will save them from Labour’s illiberalism. Stunning.
Grieve was too liberal? *shudders*
If this is the case then we have a foreign media magnet directing more power over a political party then the EU which Murdoch vehemently campaignes against.
It is also true that the right wing are amock now amongst establishments within the world just as much as the left were supposedly in the past subverting democracy in all areas of life.
Don Paskini
owned by a wealthy foreigner
British owners for British papers? Does foreign ownership of British businesses bother you?
It obviously bothered Tony Woodley of Unite who said yesterday at conference:
‘”We do not need an Australian/American coming to our country with a paper that has never supported one progressive policy…”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/sep/30/the-tony-ripped-up-labour
Would he have dared sneer the same way about an Indian or African businessman?
Concentrated private power is in a state of continually undermining democracy. This is just a minor, yet very public, example.
I assume incidentally, that all references to the Independent will also be given the suffix owned by a wealthy foreigner. The Telegraph could be owned by two wealthy pseudo-foreigners and the Guardian could be owned by a tax avoidance scheme.
I would point out that Mr Grieve moved posts some time ago, and that he is still shadowing Justice. It makes the argument look a bit thin dont you think?
I would point out that Mr Grieve moved posts some time ago, and that he is still shadowing Justice.
Her problem seemed to be his shadow home secretary portfolio.
Remember he was quickly installed after David Davis resigned… and then was unceremoniously and quickly moved to justice and Chris Grayling bought in.
Sunny
I hear what you say, but I just dont buy the idea that Mr Grieves move, demanded by Rebeka was all that Rupert was waiting for.
I much more buy the idea that Murdoch is protecting his empire by ensuring he has the best chance of being on the winning side. He has done it before many times.
While outrageous if true, I don’t really buy the idea that Grieve was moved from the Home Office specifically because of a request from Rebekah Wade. Anyone who saw Grieve’s performances in his brief tenure as Shadow Home Sec would have come to the same conclusion – he’s one of the better brains on the Tory front bench, but not heavyweight enough for the Home Office brief. Chris Grayling is better at getting out the punchy, populist messages necessary for the role, as was David Davis.
This just goes to show how much The Sun does effect elections despite the denials from politicians and other newspapers. It is not because The Sun is a particularly good newspaper, but what makes it so important politically, is that it has a very wide range of voters who read it.
During the Thatcher years the Mirror had little effect on elections despite getting nearly 3 million sales a day. During the last ten years The Torygraph has had no influence on elections either, despite being the biggest selling broadsheet. Problem for both was that they were singing to the choir. Their readership is made up of supporters of one party or the other. The Sun has value for politicians in that it is read by a much wider cross section of voters.
If it was not true Blair and now Cameron would not bend the knee to Murdoch.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
-
Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: Power without responsibility http://bit.ly/9uvv8
[Original tweet] -
Sunder Katwala
Was Cameron ditching Grieve as Shadow HomeSec a precondition for Sun’s support, as @TimMontgomerie reports? http://tiny.cc/U7hrp
[Original tweet] -
Chris Paul
RT @nextleft Cam ditching Grieve as Shadow HomeSec precondition for Sun support as @TimMontgomerie says? http://tiny.cc/U7hrp <– & GOO too?
-
Liberal Conspiracy
Article:: Power without responsibility http://bit.ly/9uvv8
-
Sunder Katwala
Was Cameron ditching Grieve as Shadow HomeSec a precondition for Sun’s support, as @TimMontgomerie reports? http://tiny.cc/U7hrp
-
Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy ยป Power without responsibility -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sunder Katwala and Chris Paul. Chris Paul said: RT @nextleft Cam ditching Grieve as Shadow HomeSec precondition for Sun support as @TimMontgomerie says? http://tiny.cc/U7hrp <– & GOO too? [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
156 Comments
28 Comments
24 Comments
70 Comments
39 Comments
31 Comments
27 Comments
58 Comments
73 Comments
20 Comments
13 Comments
16 Comments
47 Comments
115 Comments
38 Comments
17 Comments
43 Comments
121 Comments
26 Comments
NEWS ARTICLES ARCHIVE