Controversy around MEP Kaminski grows deeper


by Sunny Hundal    
11:09 am - October 7th 2009

Tweet       Share on Tumblr

Controversy around the Polish MEP – who leads the Conservatives new EU grouping – is growing deeper.

Writing in the Guardian yesterday Edward McMillian-Scott pointed out that the main argument made by Tories for a new EU grouping is hypocritical – Kaminski supports the Lisbon treaty.

Kaminski himself – against whom I stood and won re-election as a vice-president in July – has supported the Lisbon Treaty in public and private. As one commentator who has followed the issue writes, “Kaminski – wait for it – likes the Lisbon Treaty. He admires it. He thinks it protects national sovereignty. He wanted Ireland to say yes to it. He is completely at odds with the Tories on it.” Hardly surprising given the praise of his former boss, Polish President Lech Kaczynski, for the original reform treaty since “basically Poland got what it wanted“.

Furthermore, he pointed out, Kaminski also supports the European Common Agricultural Policy, which is hated by Tories.

He also alleged that Kamisky misled people about his earlier political history:

Michal Kaminski tried to cover up his membership (see his Wikipedia editing history for 25 June), later pretending that he was a schoolboy member. But he was caught out by an NOP spokesman, who told the Daily Telegraph that he was an activist from the ages of 17 to 20, his formative political experience. Even now, he is pictured on the homepage of the NOP website, which comments that no good comes to those who try to dissemble about their past.

He further exposes parts of Kaminski’s past:

Kaminski now parades his pro-Israel stance, appearing in Manchester as a guest of Conservative Friends of Israel. But in 2001, he campaigned against an apology for the Jedwabne pogrom in July 1941, when hundreds of Jews were rounded up by their neighbours and burnt in a barn, a massacre so notorious that a play, ‘Our Class’, based on it opened in London recently. As noted by former director of the Institute for Jewish Policy Research Antony Lerman, the reports about Kaminski have been shown to be true; and he observes that being “pro-Israeli” does not necessarily mean that someone is incapable of holding antisemitic views.

Journalists continue to unearth his past, highlighting Kaminski’s attempts to twist and turn. An interview with the Polish paper Nasza Polska shows that Kaminski had said that Poland should apologise only if “someone from the Jewish side will apologise for what the Jews did during the Soviet occupation between 1939 and 1941″. There were three million Jews in Poland before the Holocaust. Some of the few survivors later worked with the victorious Soviets to identify the Nazis’ Polish collaborators: wouldn’t you?

Leading Polish daily newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza politely skewers Kaminski with the recent comment that he “is not officially and completely an antisemite or homophobic, but at some point he recognised that these things can help him politically”. His repellent party, according to Tel Aviv University’s Stephen Roth Institute, contains radical nationalists and ex-members of antisemitic organisations. It is allied with Radio Maryja, a nationalist Catholic radio station and a key force on the far right, which gives airtime to antisemitic ranters.

And yet the Tories are desperately trying to avoid any more focus on Kaminki’s past, while pretending that the new grouping was necessary for them to continue with their agenda in Europe.

Last month Anthony Lerman also countered the view that Kaminski was not anti-semitic simply because he was pro-Israeli:

It’s not difficult to explain why Pollard would get this so wrong, and I’ll come to that in a minute. But what stood out most starkly in the article was the following: “Far from being an antisemite, Mr Kaminski is about as pro-Israeli an MEP as exists.” The idea that being “pro-Israeli” inoculates you against being an antisemite, or that it means that you are incapable of holding antisemitic views, is simply false – both as a theoretical proposition and as a statement of fact. But said by Pollard, at this point in time, such a statement comes as no surprise.

More: Carl Packman – Excellent work on that dubious figure Kaminski

  Tweet   Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. Dick the Prick

He’s not exactly a reliable source is he? This is a minor storm in a teacup by people who really should mind their own business.

2. Lee Griffin

1. yes yes, sweep this whole messy and ugly affair under the rug. It has amazing implications for the “honesty” of the Tories and those they want to be a power in the EU yet people should “mind their own business”. Very good.

“Writing in the Guardian yesterday Edward McMillian-Scott pointed out that the main argument made by Tories for a new EU grouping is hypocritical – Kaminski supports the Lisbon treaty”.

But the Lisbon Treaty isn’t the reason the Tories made for forming a new alliance, in fact seeing as Cameron made the promise to leave the EPP prior to the signing of the Lisbon treaty it could not possibly have been the reason for forming a new alliance.

4. Dick the Prick

‘Why was there no call from luvvie-dom to boycott the ‘anti-gay Tories’ for being in alliance with the EPP, when the group includes Polish Civic Platform, the Deputy Speaker of which rejoiced in a court decision to deprive a lesbian mother of custody of her four-year-old daughter: “The court didn’t bow to pressure from the aggressive homosexual lobby, which came to make a scene as usual”. And it also includes Forza Italia, who produced a blatantly ‘homophobic’ poster at the last Italian general election (“Daddy and Papa? This isn’t the family we want!”). And the German CDU are not above manifestations of racism, having called for the deportation of ‘criminal foreigners’: “We have too many criminal young foreigners… Germany has had a Christian and Western culture for centuries, and foreigners who don’t stick to our rules don’t belong here”. They also campaigned in 2000 under the slogan Kinder statt Inder (‘Children rather than Indians’). And let us not forget the Austrian People’s Party, whose Secretary General called for the banning of burqas, adding: “If we allow consultations to be held in Turkish, we will one day become Turkish ourselves.”

All of these parties are members of the EPP. But Ben Summerskill and Stephen Fry never once objected to their ‘extreme’ and ‘offensive’ views, and never demanded of David Cameron that he disassociate from such ‘homophobes’ and ‘fascists’.

HT – Cranmer

The dig about the Common Agricultural Policy is a little strange – I’m pleased to hear the Tories are opposed to it (though slightly suprised), as pretty much everyone else in the UK opposes it. However, pretty much everyone else in the EU supports it, whether Polish or not.

The Lisbon stuff is far more revealing – principally because it puts the lie to what Cameron said about the possibility of delays to Polish & Czech ratification. Certainly Polish ratification looks like it’ll be swift if the treaty is that popular amongst rival political parties.

“The dig about the Common Agricultural Policy is a little strange – I’m pleased to hear the Tories are opposed to it (though slightly suprised),”

Not really, it’s a a very un-free-market policy.

“by people who really should mind their own business.”

You mean Jews?

Why was there no call from luvvie-dom to boycott the ‘anti-gay Tories’ for being in alliance with the EPP, when the group includes Polish Civic Platform, the Deputy Speaker of which rejoiced in a court decision to deprive a lesbian mother of custody of her four-year-old daughter:

He wasn’t the head of the fucking grouping was he? And how big was that grouping compared to this one? How many times does this point have to be drummed into you thickos?

#6 I meant in the sense that farmers are part of their traditional voting base. The NFU opposes scrapping/replacing CAP. Nonetheless, if the Tories are indeed joining Labour in coming out against CAP, I’m pleased.

It’s easy enough to smear any European grouping with allegations of a colourful past.

The EPP contains Fine Gael, the successor of the Army Comrades Association, whose Blueshirts in the 1930s sought to emulate Hitler and Mussolini (no gratuitous bad jokes about their competence, please). They also contain the Austrian People’s Party, the successor organization the Fatherland Front and its subsidiary the Christian Social Party, both of whom were horribly implicated in the Anschluss and the ensuing Nazi administration. And, albeit understandably, the Finnish Kokoomus party collaborated with the Germans during the war. The Spanish Popular Party was founded by Franco’s Minister of Tourism. And, perhaps most famously, there’s the Italian Party now called PdL, but formerly called MSI, which was the refoundation of Mussolini’s own party.

Likewise, the PES has the obvious renamed Communist parties in Bulgaria, Lithuania, Poland, Slovenia, and so on. We could start mentioning purges, Stalin, and every other word that might offend the purity of your bodily fluids.

Perhaps we should all go and vote for the Monster Raving Loony Party.

The attacks on Mr Kaminski are worse than childish. They deserve far more disdain than the stupid whispers about what members of the Labour government did as students. For they don’t reflect on Mr Kaminski per se, but on the amount of time for which democracy has been legal in Poland. They are precariously close to racism.

For they don’t reflect on Mr Kaminski per se, but on the amount of time for which democracy has been legal in Poland. They are precariously close to racism.

That’s the funniest thing I’ve heard so far – pointing out Kaminski’s past is racism itself. Hilarious.

“You’re a racist, so that gives me the right to be a racist” isn’t a sensible argument. Any politician who isn’t some robot clone of the variety so beloved of New Labour will have said (or done) something idiotic at some point; that doesn’t give us an excuse to be eternal idiots back. Ultimately, flawed politicians are good for democracy.

We should be welcoming the Polish into a democratic Europe, rather than pursuing the double whammy of being inconsistently rude about their politicians for having been there when it wasn’t a free country and doing our damnedest to keep their workers out of Britain.

13. Left Outside

@13 just on a technicality, we haven’t done “our damnedest” to keep their workers out of the UK. Unlike much of Europe – including Germany – we granted poles equal freedom of movement, that’s why their here (were here, I should say, they’re leaving in record numbers).

That was us treating them fairly. It’s the press that have been doing their “damnedest” to drive up sales by providing a scapegoat.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Article:: Controversy around MEP Kaminski grows deeper http://bit.ly/J4Tqb

  2. Liberal Conspiracy

    Article:: Controversy around MEP Kaminski grows deeper http://bit.ly/J4Tqb

  3. Left Outside

    An Argument in Favour of the CAP…

    The Common Agricultural Policy of the EU is one of the largest subsidies in the world, “it represents 48% of the EU’s budget [or] €49.8 billion in 2006.” That is a lot of money in anyone’s book, but when it appears hardly anyone…

  4. StopTheRight

    Controversy around MEP Kaminski grows deeper http://alturl.com/haw9

  5. Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » Controversy around MEP Kaminski grows deeper -- Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by StopTheRight. StopTheRight said: Controversy around MEP Kaminski grows deeper http://alturl.com/haw9 [...]

  6. Liberal Conspiracy » Tory attempts to protect Kaminski keep failing

    [...] up if he is to avoid further scrutiny. The former Tory MEP Edward McMillan-Scott has also offered several inconsistencies in what Kaminski has recently [...]





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.