Monthly Archives: April 2011

New Tory plans to starve the NHS of money come to light

News spread yesterday morning of the NHS Monitor letter sent to all existing Foundation Trusts and applicants, telling them that they needed to look for ‘savings’ of between 6% and 7% per year, around 50% higher than their earlier projection.

I couldn’t quite believe that the government was trying to get away with this kind of thing. It turns out, though, that this is much worse than a case of burying bad news which – let’s face it – wasn’t something Labour was averse to.
Continue reading

Immigration and mental illness

contribution by Richard Shrubb

Earlier this month, it was reported that a new study found Mexican migrants to the US were at a greater risk of depressive and anxiety disorders than their compatriots at home who did not migrate to the US.

One would assume that this would be the case, that someone moving from their home culture to another with all the stresses involved, would make the prevalence higher in the population of migrants than those either in the country they had moved from, or to?
Continue reading

Plans for May Day Trafalgar Sq occupation

The ‘Trafalgar Square Anti Cuts Occupation’ say they will celebrate their one month anniversary this May Day weekend with a 48-hour occupation starting at 6.30pm Saturday 30th April.

They have staged 24-hour peaceful anti-cuts occupations of Trafalgar Square over the last four weekends, with up to 100-200 people taking part each weekend.

This weekend’s occupation coincides with the London May Day Rally being held on Sunday 1st May on Trafalgar Square.

The occupation activists say their key aims are:

* To raise awareness of the ideological cuts that the Government is instigating – without mandate – and how they are affecting the most vulnerable in society.

* To create a safe space for all, including parents and children, where alternatives to current policy can be learned about and discussed, with workshops, talks, debates and creative art.

* To defend the right to protest. The group intends to show that without police presence, protesters can organise themselves peacefully and lawfully. This has already been successfully demonstrated on previous occupations, when the police stayed at a distance and there was no conflict. If there are attempts to remove participants, they will resist non-violently through passive resistance. The group refuses to use violence when it is violence done to our society that it is trying to resist.

To make the square livable for 48 hours, participants are asked to look after the area and put litter in bins provided. And bring some food.

@occupytraf / Facebook page / WordPress blog

The truth behind the government’s ‘sicknote Britain’ claims

Yesterday’s DWP press release on the results of the test for new Employment and Support Allowance claimants excited the usual frenzy – the Sun, the Telegraph, the Mail and the ever-egregious Express all covered it much as you might expect.

I suppose we’re going to have to get used to this being a monthly event and the forces of goodness and light could respond by rehashing our own stories.
Continue reading

Police powers are out of control

What gives the police the right to arrest a person who has not committed a crime and wasn’t planning to commit any crime?

Yesterday, long-time activist and professional thorn-in-the-side-of-the-establishment Chris Knight was pre-emptively arrested by the police (video below).

The crime? Planning a ‘zombie wedding’ stunt that featured a mock execution of Prince Andrew with a guillotine. Not the nicest of stunts, I’ll grant you, but an arrestable offence?
Continue reading

Why I think the Monarchy is great

Timothy Garton Ash gives some guarded support for the UK having a monarchy. I’d go further, and suggest it is a good idea, for three reasons.

First, the existence of a monarchy is irrational, out-of-date and absurd, with all its pomp, invented tradition and flummery. But this is an argument for it, not against it. The monarchy is much like the NHS: idiotic in theory but surprisingly successful in practice. It therefore reminds us that rationality is a very weak tool for judging the efficacy of institutions.
Continue reading

MP’s campaign against disability benefits cuts

A Welsh MP has launched a campaign to stop cuts to disability benefits through Parliament today.

Hywel Williams, MP for Arfon in North Wales, has tabled two Early Day Motions: one against the abolition of the Disability Living Allowance (DLA), and another against time-limiting the employment and support allowance.

Williams is has personal experience of disability and is a former social worker.

In a debate in Parliament last month on DLA reforms he said:

A close relative of mine, a young person severely injured in a car accident, was in just such circumstances in the early 1970s and was living in the community after extended medical treatment. At the time, mobility allowance made all the difference. It transformed his life then, and it still does now, given that he lives in a remote rural area and depends on his own transport.

The EDM against the abolition of the DLA states:

That this House is deeply concerned by the abolition of disability living allowance (DLA) and its replacement with the personal independence payment (PIP) as provided for in the Welfare Reform Bill; believes that the Government is yet to make a convincing case for reform, as noted by academics, campaigners and the Social Security Advisory Committee; notes that, whilst there may be a case for objective evidence-gathering, the Government’s plans for a face-to-face assessment will disadvantage some claimants and will mean that specialist evidence is not given due priority; further believes that the Government is misguided in its claim that PIP will be better targeted than DLA as the reforms involve a simplification of the benefit rates of payment which reduces the ability to personalise payment according to need; further notes that the Government’s target of a 20 per cent. reduction in DLA expenditure, as announced in the 2010 Budget, will lead to up to 620,000 disabled people being denied support with no justification of this policy forthcoming; and urges the Government to remove from the bill all provisions relating to DLA reform.

The EDMs are intended to keep up the pressure on this Government as the Welfare Reform Bill is subjected to Parliamentary scrutiny in the Welfare Reform Bill Committee.

The second one against time limiting of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) states:

That this House notes with extreme concern the provisions for time-limiting contribution-related employment and support allowance (ESA) to 12 months included in the Welfare Reform Bill; recognises that ESA claimants will be means-tested for income-related ESA when this period has elapsed, and that an ESA claimant with a spouse or partner working over 24 hours a week will not then be eligible for the benefit; believes that time-limiting ESA isa serious disincentive to work for the partners and carers of ESA claimants, leading to a situation where unemployment is more financially sustainable than work; further believes that time-limiting ESA punishes working families where one member claims ESA; and urges the Government to remove time-limiting ofESA from the bill prior to its Third Reading.

Rhydian Fôn James of disability rights campaign The Broken of Britain, told Liberal Conspiracy that he was extremely fortunate to be one of Mr. Williams’ constituents.

He said the government’s proposals were ludicrous for, “severely punishing working families with a disabled member – and clearly designed to slash the bill for benefit payment without thought for the thousands left in poverty.”

Want to hold companies to account? Buy a share and become an activist

contribution by Suitpossum

Yesterday was Barclay’s AGM. The World Development Movement used the opportunity to draw attention to the issue of food speculation, and others, like FairPensions, targeted the issue of living wages.

This growing ‘shareholder activism’ movement is a unique avenue for concerned individuals to use shareholder rights to secure hearings with senior management, or to embarrass them publically. Purchasing just one share is a potentially powerful tool to advance progressive causes.
Continue reading

Electoral reform: why the Yes Campaign’s message is failing

contribution by Matt Wootton

For over half a decade now my Green communications colleagues and I have had the mantra “benefits not features”. This is to steer us away from becoming too policy wonkish in how we communicate our positions. An example from the commercial world would be “this car has seatbelts with pretensioners and energy management” (features). Translation “it’s really safe” (benefit).

Unfortunately, the Yes to Fairer Votes campaign seems to have fallen into the trap of expressing the features of AV without expressing the benefits.
Continue reading