Amnesty shows how ‘clicktivism’ can work too


2:21 pm - May 27th 2011

by Robert Sharp    


Tweet       Share on Tumblr

Some good news: Eynulla Fatullayev has been released in Azerbaijan. I reported last month on the demonstrations I have attended on his behalf.

An immediate tweet discussion of the news caught my eye. From @dontgetfooled

Wow. So “clicktivism” can work after all?

This refers to Amnesty’s clever little Twitter campaign launched earlier this week (here’s my contribution). @mePadraigReidy responded thus:

clicktivism, + several years of work by @tasheschmidt from Index, Article 19, @englishpen and, of course @amnestyuk

It is of course wrong to say that “Twitter released Fatullayev” although some media outlets will report it as such. The Twitter response was made possible only because the groundwork had been laid by groups like ARTICLE19, Index on Censorship, Amnesty International and yes, English PEN.

Eynulla Fatullayev speaks with friends immediately after his release. Photo: English PEN / Turxan Qar??qa on flickr
Eynulla Fatullayev speaks with friends immediately after release. Photo: English PEN / Turxan Qar??qa on flickr

We also cannot discount the other effects. @onewmphoto said:

With news of the release of Eynulla Fatullayev following @amnestyuk‘s Twitter campaign, also talk of a ‘Eurovision effect’ on FB #Azerbaijan

Eurovision, and other types of International comings-together, are always accompanied by grandiose claims about ‘understanding’ and ‘cultural capital’ and fraternity between the human nations. (World Cup, the Olympics). However, it is rarely clear how this translates into ‘soft’ political power or influence beyond our borders.

The Fatullayev case is therefore a good and welcome example of where these cultural events do have benefits. As soon as Ell and Nikki won the Eurovision Song Contest two weekends ago, the mainstream media and the social media became peppered with negative and savvy stories about Azerbaijan (it was my job to contribute some of them!).

I do not think for one moment that @PresidentAz reads anything I write with my thumbs. But I do know that we all contributed to a critical mass of short sentences that together was of a significant size to be noticed. It is definitely the case that Azerbaijani officials, linguists and supporters would have been aware of this chatter.

Having all these discussions in the public forum of Twitter and Facebook (and ensuring through hashtags that said officials were aware of the conversations) would have left them in no doubt that a Eurovision PR headache was awaiting them in April 2012.


It would be prudent to note some obvious caveats. First, Eynulla Fatullayev was pardoned – his conviction was not overturned. This places his release as a gift of President Aliyev, not the just functioning of the law. This is not ideal.
Second, this release of a prisoner does not mean that the space for free speech in Azerbaijan is getting wider. In fact, the opposite may be true, as the Government on Baku proposes new ways to restrict discourse online. A much more difficult campaign, not centred around a free speech martyr, awaits.

  Tweet   Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  


About the author
Robert Sharp designed the Liberal Conspiracy site. He is Head of Campaigns at English PEN, a blogger, and a founder of digital design company Fifty Nine Productions. For more of this sort of thing, visit Rob's eponymous blog or follow him on Twitter @robertsharp59. All posts here are written in a personal capacity, obviously.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: Blog ,Civil liberties ,Technology

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. Shatterface

‘It is of course wrong to say that “Twitter released Fatullayev” although some media outlets will report it as such.’

Headlines like ‘Amnesty shows how clicktivism’ can work’, you mean?

‘The Twitter response was made possible only because the groundwork had been laid by groups like ARTICLE19, Index on Censorship, Amnesty International and yes, English PEN.’

All of which sound more convincing as causal factors.

Just because a Twitter campaign is chronologically prior doesn’t mean there’s a causal relationship.

Hmmmm. Read Malcolm Gladwell’s opposing view http://t.co/S41VBrG

Shatterface – re: headlines, don’t blame me for that. The sensationalist headline is entirely down to click-chaser Hundal, up in the editor’s perch.

Not sure what you mean about ‘conceptually prior’. I do think it is the case that any kind of clickivism/slacktivism won’t gain critical mass without a lot of groundwork and awareness raising being done beforehand. This groundwork is often labelled as the rather nebulous “awareness raising” which is difficult to measure.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Amnsty shows how 'clicktivism' can work to free prisoners http://bit.ly/iDTZlU

  2. War Blog DK germany

    Amnsty shows how 'clicktivism' can work to free prisoners http://bit.ly/iDTZlU

  3. Steve Hynd

    Amnsty shows how 'clicktivism' can work to free prisoners http://bit.ly/iDTZlU

  4. Andy S

    Amnsty shows how 'clicktivism' can work to free prisoners http://bit.ly/iDTZlU





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.