CPS: why we dropped @UKuncut charges


by Newswire    
2:47 pm - July 18th 2011

Tweet       Share on Tumblr

The Crown Prosecution Service today finally admitted there was no “public interest” in prosecuting the non-violent UKuncut protesters arrested at Fortnum & Mason’s on March 26th.

109 cases have been dropped. However, they say that they will continue to pursue the other 30 cases through the judicial process.

In a statement today, Alison Saunders, Chief Crown Prosecutor of CPS London, said:

After careful and necessary investigative work by the police to provide the fullest evidential picture, we have reviewed the evidence now available and considered representations made by the defence teams.

I have concluded that there is sufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction for the offence of aggravated trespass against all the defendants, however, in discontinuing these cases I have considered whether a prosecution is necessary in the public interest. I have decided that it is not, taking into account the following factors from the Code for Crown Prosecutors:

• that this was a single incident;

• that they have not been involved in similar offences previously and that they played only a minor role in the offending behaviour;

• that if these defendants had been convicted the court would be likely to impose only a nominal penalty.

The police investigation was able to identify whether these factors were present for each defendant. It was only after such an investigation that these factors could be applied.

We have warned those whose cases have been discontinued that this reasoning may not apply in future if they go on to commit other similar offences.

We have notified the court and the defendants’ representatives of this decision.

   Tweet   Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  


About the author

· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. john b

Meadows included in the dropped cases? Hope so.

2. Leon Wolfson

Sufficient evidence eh? Okay, so we can’t believe a word the police say to us, officially. Thanks for that, CPS.

3. ukliberty

OP, the statement does not mention “non-violent” or violence, so where did that come from?

john b, Meadows was charged with violent disorder and the charge doesn’t relate to Fortnum & Masons.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Police explain why they're dropped @UKuncut charges http://bit.ly/nK15tf

  2. Nemesis Republic

    RT @libcon: Police explain why they're dropped @UKuncut charges http://bit.ly/nK15tf #ukuncut

  3. Liberal Conspiracy

    CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://t.co/305brIE

  4. vicki whelan

    CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://t.co/305brIE

  5. manishta sunnia

    CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://t.co/305brIE

  6. Free Hetherington

    CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://t.co/305brIE

  7. Anonymous Watcher

    CPS=Crown Prosecution Service here in UK RT @libcon: CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://bit.ly/nK15tf

  8. Simon Berriman

    CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://t.co/305brIE

  9. Captain Swing

    CPS explain why they dropped 100+ @UKuncut charges from F&Ms http://t.co/305brIE

  10. Elena Blackmore

    What about the fact the police assured them they wouldn't be detained on leaving the store? http://t.co/Q4CrCRs

  11. Jamminjuda

    CPS drops charges against #ukuncut protesters http://t.co/jJyrA1R. Issues warning effectively binding them over without a day in court.

  12. David Davies

    CPS admits no “public interest” in prosecuting non-violent @UKuncut protesters arrested at Fortnum's on March 26th ~ http://t.co/Ei4IJy3





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.