Reality behind Mail and Express’ EU rail scare


by Tim Fenton    
11:01 am - August 16th 2011

Tweet       Share on Tumblr

Nothing is as reliable a source of scare stories for the Daily Mail and Daily Express as the EU. And that part of both papers’ readership that commutes by rail – much of it in the South-East – is always susceptible to train fare horror stories.

Thus when the Mail decided to frighten its readers over the European Commission (EC) transport white paper, the Express followed as in lockstep. Brussels bid to raise our rail fares by 50 per cent as Government rail subsidies face the axe– thundered this weekend’s Mail on Sunday.

The Express, characteristically getting on board a day late, concurred. Although the laughably amateur journalism then told “a policy document revealed yesterday”.

The EC works Sundays? Maybe not. So what is actually going to happen?

Well, given that the white paper, now over four months old (read it HERE [.pdf]), is only a series of proposals that have yet to be ratified by all 27 EU member states, nothing is going to happen.

But this counts for nothing with the Daily Mail, where readers are told that the EC wants to increase road charges. It doesn’t, but this spreads the panic to car owners. And the certainty of fare increases and road pricing does not survive a little examination of the much discussed white paper: here’s part of Paragraph 59 [emphases mine]:

Transport charges and taxes must be restructured in the direction of … the ‘polluter pays’ and ‘user pays’ principle … wider socioeconomic benefits … justify some level of public funding, but in the future, transport users are likely to pay for a higher proportion of the costs than today

That differs not one jot from the policy of both the previous and current UK Governments, which is that passengers will have to pay more of the costs of their journeys over time. And those “increased” road charges?

Here’s part of Paragraph 62: “For passenger cars, road charges are increasingly considered as an alternative way to generate revenue and influence traffic and travel behaviour”.

And the “Single European Railway Area”, that the Mail says “would hand greater control of Britain’s railways to Brussels”? That’s to do with abolishing obstacles to market entry, not centralised control. Paragraph 36 has the details.

So the conclusion has to be that there are no grounds – once again – for this scare story, and that – once again – a little Googling and background reading demonstrates this.

   Tweet   Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  


About the author
Tim is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He blogs more frequently at Zelo Street
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: Media ,News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. Chris

With several made up stories like this every day, they’ve succeeded in poisoning Britain’s membership of the EU. These papers have done so much damage to the life prospects of every one of us.

2. Elagabalus

Honestly… China can take over our railways for all I care. British train companies are the greediest, most useless twunts on Earth.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    The reality behind Mail and Express' EU rail scare http://t.co/hGh8mDT

  2. Lee Hyde

    The reality behind Mail and Express' EU rail scare http://t.co/hGh8mDT

  3. David Traynier

    This is quick read-and-RT RT @libcon: The reality behind Mail and Express' EU rail scare http://t.co/yTKE3H1

  4. Liam Joyce

    The reality behind Mail and Express’ EU rail scare | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/ESoiC3B via @libcon

  5. DF

    The reality behind Mail and Express' EU rail scare http://t.co/hGh8mDT

  6. Panda

    The reality behind Mail and Express' EU rail scare http://t.co/hGh8mDT

  7. IpswichCAB

    Reality behind Mail and Express’ EU rail scare stories ~ http://t.co/iNd4LMP





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.