New publication on ‘culture beyond oil’
5:26 pm - November 29th 2011
| Tweet | Share on Tumblr |
If you happen to be in the London area this week, Platform, Art Not Oil and Liberate Tate are launching a new publication, ‘Not if but when – Culture Beyond Oil’ on the evening of Tuesday 29 November.
The publication features art work that people have made in response to oil companies and their impacts, as well as a series of articles examining the issues in greater detail.
Like the title of the publication states, it’s not a question of if, but when oil-sponsorship becomes socially unacceptable, in the same way that tobacco sponsorship did a few decades back.
In the last two years, art-interventionists Liberate Tate have been doing a great job of creatively bringing this tension to the surface through a series of high impact, direct action performances in gallery spaces that have propelled the issue into the mainstream.
If you accept the need to draw some sort of line about what is and what isn’t ethically acceptable, then we need to renegotiate exactly where thNose lines are in light of our awareness of the role that oil companies are playing in dragging us to the edge of climate catastrophe.
There’s a growing sense in the cultural sector of this being the case. Apart from letters signed by hundreds of people in the arts Liberate Tate and Platform are sending round a petition calling on Nick Serota to end the relationship with BP.
There’s been a great response to it so far, but we’re still hoping to get a few thousand more signatures on to it before we present it to the Tate board. Click here to sign it, and please share it with other people who you think might be interested.
—
Follow ‘End oil sponsorship of the arts’ on facebook, and @platformlondon and @liberatetate on twitter, to stay up to date with this campaign.
| Tweet | Share on Tumblr |  |
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Oil is used to create energy and oil is used to create material (paint, fabrics, plastics etc). Those propositions are why I am against using oil for energy. I would prefer that oil was used to make objects rather than energy.
But I am a realist. The transition from a carbon based economy is dependent on consumption of fossil fuels. At this time we cannot make steel without burning coal, and if you don’t have steel you can’t much.
@1 – Right. And the scientific turn to…oh, right, nuclear power.
@1
Indeed, the use of oil in things such as plastics is much more important. For starters,. it doesnt involve releasing CO2 into the atmosphere, and such objects can usually be recycyled.
However, what this does require is a plentiful supply of cheap non-fossil fuel energy. We have two solutions – renewables (Solar, Wind and Tidal) and Nuclear. Because of the nature of the former, we must have the latter too.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
-
Liberal Conspiracy
New publication on 'culture beyond oil' http://t.co/GCqRqisG
-
AdamFlude &Friends
New publication on 'culture beyond oil' http://t.co/GCqRqisG
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
