Why doesn’t Delingpole stand for his election, if he’s so good at winning arguments?

Because he’d make the LPUK’s showing at the last election they contested look like a landslide victory, that’s why.

Right-wing cunts don’t seem to understand that if leading politicians distance themselves from their views, it’s not because lefties are running a fascist dictatorship, it’s because their views are unelectable.

Hell, it’s not as if ‘libtard’ is even his own creation.

He’s shovelling other people’s excrement off the floor and chucking that around. I guess he’s too thick even to shit his own pants.

‘But then again, we libtards probably just don’t get it. That’s because we are characterised by an aversion to big ideas. Liberty, empiricism, small state, low taxation?’

Liberty and empiricism are prerequisites for the liberal left (authoritarians and faith-based policy-makers can fuck right off) and a smaller state and low (targeted) taxation out to be their ultimate aim. Big states are self-interested, self-legitimating and self-perpetuating.

And just for future reference – it’s okay to used ‘retard’ or derivatives thereof from this point on? Just so I can bookmark this page for when I need it?

‘Ought’, not ‘out’. Somebody please sneek back the editing function while Sunny’s away.

I’m all for the coinage of snazzy neologisms

Try this one on for size, from the comments at SYB: “‘Delingpole’ should be the official name for a penis protruding from one’s forehead.”

@Dunc

Seconded!

Delingpole = another word for knobjockey

Excellent suggestion, 5. Perhaps there could be a new updated version of The Meaning of Liff with things like this in?

What would a Hannan be?

“What would a Hannan be?”

The opposite of a Harman of course….

I tend to think that even half-heartedly debating Delingpole’s ideas is to engage in a massive great category error. It’s like holding a symposium on the moral and ethical implications of “In the Night Garden.”

@ Jonn

Delingpole is Tinky Winky, and Hannan is the baby in the sun

I tend to think that even half-heartedly debating Delingpole’s ideas is to engage in a massive great category error. It’s like holding a symposium on the moral and ethical implications of “In the Night Garden.”

Delingpole unwittingly engages in what I like to call the ‘asymmetrical horseshit gambit’ – by saying things so completely absurd you completely demoralise your opponent by forcing them to engage you in a foreign reality.

I had the misfortune to read his book once, he really is certifiable.

Bill Hicks, may he rest in peace, had a few things to say about Rush Limbaugh (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F7Q7BkAbCk). Funnily enough, its obscene.

I had the misfortune to read his book once, he really is certifiable.

I thought Coward on the Beach was rather good…

Has it got Germans in though?

They’re evidence of ‘PC gone mad’ according to Delingpole.

Delingpole deserves personal attacks. He is a thoroughly disgusting excuse for a man. Everybody should read his opinions on when it is, or is not, acceptable to beat up children.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/10079233/What_the_BBC_didnt_want_you_to_know_about_the_Belfast_Romanians/

The person who wrote that is the scum of the earth. He can pretentiously call it an “ad hominem” attack if he wants. I call him someone who isn’t fit to mix with decent people.

Sorry, being a libtard I’m a bit slow. Is a righty a rectum?

https://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/01/27/constituent-harassed-by-telegraph-readers-after-sending-email-to-tory-ppc/

What a total cunt Delingpole, for suggesting that it makes a difference whether beaten-up kids are one race or another. Complete racist cunt.

‘Delingpole = another word for knobjockey’

Ah, homophobia. Showing your real colours I see.

‘Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted’
except when directed at those designated non-people.

Fuck off Shitterface, you virgin.

‘Fuck off Shitterface, you virgin.’

Oh, my god – does it show?

Real high level of debate here and PP right now.

@ “Fuck off you virgin”?

What’s going on people? Up your game, say something relevant or if not, at least entertaining, not pubescent.

Why? I’m having a good night slagging Tories off.

‘[T]he language of debate has been hijacked so comprehensively by the liberal left that not even conservatives dare speak up for right-wing views any more for fear of being dismissed as extremist.’

Haha, because of course it’s so hard to find right wing views expressed in our media. Just like “we’re not allowed to talk about immigration”, which explains the total absence of scare stories about immigration on the front pages of the Express, Mail etc.

Seriously though, it’s really not worth responding to Delingpole – his only aim is to provoke the people he hates, and he really hates liberal lefties. If we really want to upset him we should just ignore him.

Not quite, Andrew Adams. He claims to enjoy attracting left-wing hatred but it’s all just a cry for help. He is fucking desperate for approval, and he doesn’t get it because he’s a complete cunt, so he pretends not to care.

Delingpole admitted once, with a hint of pride, to being taught Marxism by that idiot Brendan Buffoon from Spiked online. Bit like being taught Catholicism by Paisley. Evidence methinks of the man’s Class A stupidity.

@Dunc:

Delingpole: An erection plainly visible through the trousers of a bearded drunk fast asleep opposite you on a train.

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/reviewofbooks_article/3372/

Pair of twats.

Delingpole is very popular with sections of the blogging world such as the Cohenites, Harry Placers and the Burchill crowd (you know Chas Newkly Burden). Not really surprised that Tim J likes his book.
I feel quite sorry for the guy, to be bitter and twisted at his age, what the F*** is going to be like at 50.
At least Amis grew into his persona